The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Real-World Validation of a Computer-Aided Diagnosis System for Prediction of Polyp Histology in Colonoscopy: A Prospective Multicenter Study
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) of polyp histology could support endoscopists in clinical decision-making. However, this has not been validated in a real-world setting. METHODS: We performed a prospective, multicenter study comparing CADx and endoscopist predictions of polyp histology in real-time colonoscopy. Optical diagnosis based on visual inspection of polyps was made by experienced endoscopists. After this, the automated output from the CADx support tool was recorded. All imaged polyps were resected for histological assessment. Primary outcome was difference in diagnostic performance between CADx and endoscopist prediction of polyp histology. Subgroup analysis was performed for polyp size, bowel preparation, difficulty of location of the polyps, and endoscopist experience. RESULTS: A total of 661 eligible polyps were resected in 320 patients aged ≥40 years between March 2021 and July 2022. CADx had an overall accuracy of 71.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 68.0–75.0), compared with 75.2% (95% CI 71.7–78.4) for endoscopists ( P = 0.023). The sensitivity of CADx for neoplastic polyps was 61.8% (95% CI 56.9–66.5), compared with 70.3% (95% CI 65.7–74.7) for endoscopists ( P < 0.001). The interobserver agreement between CADx and endoscopist predictions of polyp histology was moderate (83.1% agreement, κ 0.661). When there was concordance between CADx and endoscopist predictions, the accuracy increased to 78.1%. DISCUSSION: The overall diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity for neoplastic polyps was higher in experienced endoscopists compared with CADx predictions, with moderate interobserver agreement. Concordance in predictions increased this diagnostic accuracy. Further research is required to improve the performance of CADx and to establish its role in clinical practice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In clinical practice, small polyps <10 mm are more frequently encountered and are more difficult for endoscopist to accurately diagnose.14”
From Human–machine interaction in optical polyp diagnosis: decision-making after CADx polyp diagnosis (2026) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“Previous studies show that diagnostic accuracy for CADx also decreased for diminutive polyps <5 mm compared to small 6-9mm and larger polyps > 10 mm.14”
From Human–machine interaction in optical polyp diagnosis: decision-making after CADx polyp diagnosis (2026) · cites this paper as [14]
Citations
Cites
Abu Dayyeh, B. K., Thosani, N., Konda, V., Wallace, M. B., Rex, D. K., Chauhan, S. S., Hwang, J. H., Komanduri, S., Manfredi, M., Maple, J. T., et al. (2015) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.022 · Cited by 389
Real-Time Artificial Intelligence–Based Optical Diagnosis of Neoplastic Polyps during Colonoscopy
Barua, I., Wieszczy, P., Kudo, S.-E., Misawa, M., Holme, Ø., Gulati, S., Williams, S., Mori, K., Itoh, H., Takishima, K., et al. (2022) · NEJM Evidence · doi:10.1056/evidoa2200003 · Cited by 119
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Kaminski, 2017, Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative, Endoscopy, 49, 378, 10.1055/s-0043-103411 · DOI
- Rex, 2015, Quality indicators for colonoscopy, Gastrointest Endosc, 81, 31, 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.058 · DOI · Paper page
- Barua, 2021, Artificial intelligence for polyp detection during colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Endoscopy, 53, 277, 10.1055/a-1201-7165 · DOI · Paper page
- Gong, 2020, Detection of colorectal adenomas with a real-time computer-aided system (ENDOANGEL): A randomised controlled study, Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 5, 352, 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30413-3 · DOI · Paper page
- Repici, 2020, Efficacy of real-time computer-aided detection of colorectal neoplasia in a randomized trial, Gastroenterology, 159, 512, 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.062 · DOI · Paper page
- Su, 2020, Impact of a real-time automatic quality control system on colorectal polyp and adenoma detection: A prospective randomized controlled study (with videos), Gastrointest Endosc, 91, 415, 10.1016/j.gie.2019.08.026 · DOI · Paper page
- Wang, 2019, Real-time automatic detection system increases colonoscopic polyp and adenoma detection rates: A prospective randomised controlled study, Gut, 68, 1813, 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317500 · DOI · Paper page
- Wang, 2020, Effect of a deep-learning computer-aided detection system on adenoma detection during colonoscopy (CADe-DB trial): A double-blind randomised study, Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 5, 343, 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30411-X · DOI · Paper page
- Hassan, 2021, Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Gastrointest Endosc, 93, 77, 10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.059 · DOI · Paper page
- Kandel, 2019, Should we resect and discard low risk diminutive colon polyps, Clin Endosc, 52, 239, 10.5946/ce.2018.136 · DOI
- Neumann, 2018, Leaving colorectal polyps in place can be achieved with high accuracy using blue light imaging (BLI), United European Gastroenterol J, 6, 1099, 10.1177/2050640618769731 · DOI
- von Renteln, 2018, Simplifying resect and discard strategies for real-time assessment of diminutive colorectal polyps, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 16, 706, 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.11.036 · DOI
- Ang, 2021, Colonoscopy and artificial intelligence: Bridging the gap or a gap needing to be bridged?, Artif Intell Gastrointest Endosc, 2, 36, 10.37126/aige.v2.i2.36 · DOI
- Bang, 2021, Computer-aided diagnosis of diminutive colorectal polyps in endoscopic images: Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy, J Med Internet Res, 23, e29682, 10.2196/29682 · DOI
- Lui, 2020, Accuracy of artificial intelligence on histology prediction and detection of colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Gastrointest Endosc, 92, 11, 10.1016/j.gie.2020.02.033 · DOI
- Zorron Cheng Tao Pu, 2020, Computer-aided diagnosis for characterization of colorectal lesions: Comprehensive software that includes differentiation of serrated lesions, Gastrointest Endosc, 92, 891, 10.1016/j.gie.2020.02.042 · DOI
- Cao, 2022, Effect of oral simethicone on the quality of colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, J Dig Dis, 23, 134, 10.1111/1751-2980.13084 · DOI
- Yeh, 2019, The benefit of adding oral simethicone in bowel preparation regimen for the detection of colon adenoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis, J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 34, 830, 10.1111/jgh.14508 · DOI
- Ang, 2019, A prospective randomized study of colonoscopy using blue laser imaging and white light imaging in detection and differentiation of colonic polyps, Endosc Int Open, 7, E1207, 10.1055/a-0982-3111 · DOI
- Yoshida, 2014, The ability of a novel blue laser imaging system for the diagnosis of invasion depth of colorectal neoplasms, J Gastroenterol, 49, 73, 10.1007/s00535-013-0772-7 · DOI
- Rex, 2011, The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps, Gastrointest Endosc, 73, 419, 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.023 · DOI · Paper page
- Hassan, 2010, A resect and discard strategy would improve cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 8, 865, 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.05.018 · DOI
- Vleugels, 2019, Diminutive polyps with advanced histologic features do not increase risk for metachronous advanced colon neoplasia, Gastroenterology, 156, 623, 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.10.050 · DOI
- Hassan, 2022, Artificial intelligence allows leaving-in-situ colorectal polyps, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 20, 2505, 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.04.045 · DOI · Paper page
- Rondonotti, 2023, Artificial intelligence-assisted optical diagnosis for the resect-and-discard strategy in clinical practice: The Artificial intelligence BLI Characterization (ABC) study, Endoscopy, 55, 14, 10.1055/a-1852-0330 · DOI · Paper page
- Gupta, 2020, Spotlight: US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer recommendations for follow-up after colonoscopy and polypectomy, Gastroenterology, 158, 1154, 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.014 · DOI
- Hassan, 2020, Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline: Update 2020, Endoscopy, 52, 687, 10.1055/a-1185-3109 · DOI
- Koo, 2021, Key tips for using computer-aided diagnosis in colonoscopy - observations from two different platforms, Endoscopy, 54, 1018
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hassan, C., Misawa, M., Rizkala, T., Mori, Y., Sultan, S., Facciorusso, A., Antonelli, G., Spadaccini, M., Houwen, B. B. S. L., Rondonotti, E., et al. (2024) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m23-2865 · Cited by 56
Self-citationHuman–machine interaction in optical polyp diagnosis: decision-making after CADx polyp diagnosis
Dubois, D., Jalal, Y., Pohl, H., Rex, D. K., Hassan, C., Djinbachian, R., Oleksiw, M., Michal, V., & von Renteln, D. (2026) · Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwag016
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, J. W., Wu, C. C. H., Lee, J. W. J., Liang, R., Soon, G. S. T., Wang, L. M., Koh, X. H., Koh, C. J., Chew, W. D., Lin, K. W., Thian, M. Y., Matthew, R., Kim, G., Khor, C. J. L., Fock, K. M., Ang, T. L., So, J. B. Y., & on behalf of the Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Singapore (AIGES) Study Group
- Affiliations
- SingHealth (SG)
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Tan Tock Seng Hospital (SG)
- National University Hospital (SG)
- Changi General Hospital (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Li, James Weiquan
- ORCID
- Venue
- American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Published
- 2023-04-11
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1353-1364
- ISSN
- 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-0241
- OpenAlex
- W4364377313
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 6
- FWCI
- 7.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
- Keywords
- computer-aided diagnosis, colonoscopy, colorectal polyps, polyp histology prediction, neoplastic polyps, diagnostic accuracy, interobserver agreement, bowel preparation, polyp size, endoscopist experience
- MeSH terms
- Colonic Polyps, Colonoscopy, Computers, Humans, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Colorectal Neoplasms, Narrow Band Imaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Real-World Validation of a Computer-Aided Diagnosis System for Prediction of Polyp Histology in Colonoscopy: A Prospective Multicenter Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14309/ajg.0000000000002282
- The paper
- Li, J. W., Wu, C. C. H., Lee, J. W. J., Liang, R., Soon, G. S. T., Wang, L. M., Koh, X. H., Koh, C. J., Chew, W. D., Lin, K. W., Thian, M. Y., Matthew, R., Kim, G., Khor, C. J. L., Fock, K. M., Ang, T. L., So, J. B. Y., & on behalf of the Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Singapore (AIGES) Study Group. (2023). Real-World Validation of a Computer-Aided Diagnosis System for Prediction of Polyp Histology in Colonoscopy: A Prospective Multicenter Study. American Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000002282