Cited by 11Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseOcular Diseases and Behçet’s SyndromeMicroscopic Colitis

Fecal Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4: An Emergent Biomarker in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Open access
Pinto-Lopes, Pedro, Melo, Francisco, Afonso, Joana, Pinto-Lopes, Rui, Rocha, Cátia, Melo, Daniel, Macedo, Guilherme, Dias, Cláudia Camila +3 more·2021·Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) is a membrane-bound glycoprotein that acts as a receptor but also exists in a soluble form. It has been recognized as a mediator of inflammation and considered a biomarker in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: We evaluated a prospectively recruited cohort, consisting of 101 patients with IBD, using validated clinical indexes; 22 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) underwent endoscopic evaluation. Fecal DPP-4 (fDPP-4) levels were analyzed and correlated with clinical scores, Mayo endoscopic score (in UC patients), serum DPP-4, C-reactive protein, and fecal calprotectin. Immunohistochemical staining for DPP-4 in intestinal biopsies was also performed. RESULTS: When compared with remitters, median fDPP-4 levels were higher in patients with ileal Crohn's disease (CD) (7,584 [1,464–7,816] vs 2,104 [630–2,676] ng/mL, P = 0.015) and lower in patients with UC exhibiting clinical activity (1,213 [559–1,682] vs 7,814 [2,555–7,985] ng/mL, P < 0.001). Patients with UC presenting endoscopic activity also had lower levels than remitters (939 [559–1,420] vs 7,544 [4,531–7,940] ng/mL, P = 0.006). Fecal DPP-4 discriminated clinical activity from remission with areas under the curve of 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58–0.94, P = 0.015) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.68–0.93, P < 0.001) in CD and UC, respectively; it allowed to differentiate endoscopic activity in patients with UC, with areas under the curve of 0.84 (95% CI 0.63–1.00, P = 0.009). Immunohistochemical analysis revealed higher DPP-4 apical expression in UC remitters, but no statistically significant differences were revealed between patients with ileal CD. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that fDPP-4 can be used as a biomarker of IBD activity, particularly in UC. The expression profiles in intestinal tissue might represent a functional compartmentalization of DPP-4 expression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000320

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In two well-established rodent models of IBS that lead to visceral hyperalgesia, the enhanced visceromotor response to colorectal distension was reversed following administration of F. prausnitzii.

    “Using two well-established rodent models of IBS that lead to visceral hyperalgesia in vivo, it was found that the enhanced visceromotor response to colorectal distension was reversed following administration of F. prausnitzii.”
  • Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is a potential source of anti-nociceptive mediators, including a PAR-4 activating serine protease.

    “Subsequent studies have identified Faecalibacterium prausnitzii as a potential source of anti-nociceptive mediators, including a PAR-4 activating serine protease.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pinto-Lopes, P., Melo, F., Afonso, J., Pinto-Lopes, R., Rocha, C., Melo, D., Macedo, G., Dias, C. C., Carneiro, F., Magro, F., & for the Portuguese IBD Study Group (GEDII)
Affiliations
  • Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal;
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • Broomfield Hospital (GB)
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
  • Hospital de São João (PT)
Corresponding author
Magro, Fernando
Venue
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology
Published
2021-03
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
e00320
ISSN
2155-384X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3135671158
Cited by
11
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Microscopic Colitis
Keywords
dipeptidyl peptidase IV, fecal biomarkers, inflammatory bowel disease, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, disease activity, endoscopic activity, remission, fecal calprotectin, C-reactive protein, diagnostic accuracy, inflammatory markers
MeSH terms
Adult, C-Reactive Protein, Colitis, Ulcerative, Colon, Crohn Disease, Feces, Female, Humans, Ileum, Intestinal Mucosa, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Signal Transduction, Biomarkers, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal, Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4, Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review