The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Constructivism in Smart Tourism Research : Seoul Destination Image
Abstract
This paper specifically delineated the methodological application of constructivism in smart tourism studies. It explained what constructivism is and how this methodology could be applied in the study of smart tourism. In this study, residents of Seoul participated in constructivist research using the Q method to identify their subjectivities toward Seoul based on photographs most commonly found in tourism promotional material. Residents are concerned with good governance and cultural integrity, and they are aware of their role as stakeholders in tourism in their communities. However their potential contribution to destination image formation has been usually overlooked by researchers and marketers. Three clusters of subjectivities were revealed after 42 photographs of Seoul were sorted by 37 respondents. The results show how respondents perceived Seoul’s destination image. The three clusters agreed that symbolic monuments were the key representations of Seoul. The paper recommends that tourism marketers and policy makers should focus on understanding and coordinating with residents’ perceived image of Seoul as a destination when planning and decision making, especially in promoting Seoul as a destination market. This study, in conjunction with other constructivist research offers insight into how destination image is, especially with the rise of smart tourism, a complex social construction.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Governments in China and South Korea are heavily funding initiatives mostly focused on building the technological infrastructure that supports smart tourism (Hwang et al. 2015).”
From Smart tourism: foundations and developments (2015) · cites this paper as Hwang et al. 2015
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Smart tourism: foundations and developments
Gretzel, U., Sigala, M., Xiang, Z., & Koo, C. (2015) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-015-0196-8 · Cited by 2,589
“on building the technological infrastructure that supports smart tourism (Hwang et al. 2015).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Ph. D. Candidate, C. A. E. M. D., Hwang, J., Park, H.-Y., & Hunter, W. C.
- Venue
- Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems
- Published
- 2015-02-28
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 163-178
- ISSN
- 1229-0270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3156136731
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 5.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gyeong'yeong jeongbohag yeon'gu/Gyeong-yeong jeongbohak yeon-gu (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Q Methodology Applications
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management › Culinary Culture and Tourism
- Keywords
- smart tourism, destination image, constructivism, Q methodology, Seoul, good governance, cultural integrity, tourism stakeholders, tourism promotion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review