Cited by 1Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Ipragliflozin improves the hepatic outcomes of patients with diabetes with NAFLD

Open access
Takahashi, Hirokazu, Kessoku, Takaomi, Kawanaka, Miwa, Nonaka, Michihiro, Hyogo, Hideyuki, Fujii, Hideki, Nakajima, Tomoaki, Imajo, Kento +16 more·2025·Diabetes mellitus

Abstract

Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are now widely used to treat diabetes, but their effects on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) remain to be determined. We aimed to evaluate the effects of SGLT2is on the pathogenesis of NAFLD. A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial was conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes with NAFLD. The changes in glycemic control, obesity, and liver pathology were compared between participants taking ipragliflozin (50 mg/day for 72 weeks; IPR group) and participants being managed without SGLT2is, pioglitazone, glucagon-like peptide-1 analogs, or insulin (CTR group). In the IPR group (n = 25), there were significant decreases in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and body mass index (BMI) during the study (HbA1c, -0.41%, P < 0.01; BMI, -1.06 kg/m2, P < 0.01), whereas these did not change in the CTR group (n = 26). Liver pathology was evaluated in 21/25 participants in the IPR/CTR groups, and hepatic fibrosis was found in 17 (81%) and 18 (72%) participants in the IPR and CTR groups at baseline. This was ameliorated in 70.6% (12 of 17) of participants in the IPR group and 22.2 % (4 of 18). of those in the CTR group (P < 0.01). Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) resolved in 66.7% of IPR-treated participants and 27.3% of CTR participants. None of the participants in the IPR group developed NASH, whereas 33.3% of the CTR group developed NASH. Conclusion: Long-term ipragliflozin treatment ameliorates hepatic fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. Thus, ipragliflozin might be effective for the treatment and prevention of NASH in patients with diabetes, as well as improving glycemic control and obesity. Therefore, SGLT2is may represent a therapeutic choice for patients with diabetes with NAFLD, but further larger studies are required to confirm these effects. (Hepatology Communications 2022;6:120-132) . Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are now widely used to treat diabetes, but their effects on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) remain to be determined. We aimed to evaluate the effects of SGLT2is on the pathogenesis of NAFLD. A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial was conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes with NAFLD. The changes in glycemic control, obesity, and liver pathology were compared between participants taking ipragliflozin (50 mg/day for 72 weeks; IPR group) and participants being managed without SGLT2is, pioglitazone, glucagon-like peptide-1 analogs, or insulin (CTR group). In the IPR group (n = 25), there were significant decreases in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and body mass index (BMI) during the study (HbA1c, -0.41%, P < 0.01; BMI, -1.06 kg/m2, P < 0.01), whereas these did not change in the CTR group (n = 26). Liver pathology was evaluated in 21/25 participants in the IPR/CTR groups, and hepatic fibrosis was found in 17 (81%) and 18 (72%) participants in the IPR and CTR groups at baseline. This was ameliorated in 70.6% (12 of 17) of participants in the IPR group and 22.2 % (4 of 18). of those in the CTR group (P < 0.01). Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) resolved in 66.7% of IPR-treated participants and 27.3% of CTR participants. None of the participants in the IPR group developed NASH, whereas 33.3% of the CTR group developed NASH. Conclusion: Long-term ipragliflozin treatment ameliorates hepatic fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. Thus, ipragliflozin might be effective for the treatment and prevention of NASH in patients with diabetes, as well as improving glycemic control and obesity. Therefore, SGLT2is may represent a therapeutic choice for patients with diabetes with NAFLD, but further larger studies are required to confirm these effects. (Hepatology Communications 2022;6:120-132) .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14341/dm13340

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ipragliflozin significantly improved hepatic fibrosis and MASH resolution compared with standard care.

    “ipragliflozin, an SGLT2i, significantly improved hepatic fibrosis and MASH resolution compared with standard care.”

    From Strategies to promote liver fibrosis amelioration with involvement of restorative macrophages (2026) · cites this paper as [221]

    The histological-results section reports significantly more fibrosis-stage improvement with ipragliflozin than with control after 72 weeks (57.1% versus 16%; P=0.01). It reports MASH resolution in 66.7% of participants who had it at baseline, versus 27.3% in the control group, but does not establish that this difference was statistically significant. The limitations discussion says the sample was too small to confirm superiority for MASH resolution. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Takahashi, H., Kessoku, T., Kawanaka, M., Nonaka, M., Hyogo, H., Fujii, H., Nakajima, T., Imajo, K., Tanaka, K., Kubotsu, Y., Isoda, H., Oeda, S., Kurai, O., Yoneda, M., Ono, M., Kitajima, Y., Tajiri, R., Takamori, A., Kawaguchi, A., Aishima, S., Kage, M., Nakajima, A., Eguchi, Y., & Anzai, K.
Affiliations
  • Saga University (JP)
  • Yokohama City University (JP)
  • Kawasaki Medical School (JP)
  • Hiroshima General Hospital (JP)
  • Osaka City University (JP)
  • Sapporo Kosei General Hospital (JP)
  • Osaka City Juso Hospital
  • Tokyo Women's Medical University (JP)
  • Kurume University (JP)
Venue
Diabetes mellitus
Published
2025-05-23
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
210-227
ISSN
  • 2072-0351 (ISSN-L)
  • 2072-0378
OpenAlex
W4410750468
Cited by
1
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Mellitus (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
ipragliflozin, SGLT2 inhibitors, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, type 2 diabetes, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, liver fibrosis, glycemic control, obesity, liver pathology, pioglitazone, glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues, insulin therapy, HbA1c, body mass index, NAFLD prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review