The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The glucagon test in diagnosis of secondary adrenal insufficiency after craniospinal irradiation: the feasibility of application, the features of performing the test, and its diagnostic informativity
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The glucagon test (GT) is a promising alternative to the insulin hypoglycemia test (IHT) in diagnosis of secondary adrenal insufficiency (SAI). AIM: To study the feasibility of using the GT in patients after craniospinal irradiation and to determine the cut-off value to rule out SAI. METHODS: A total of 28 patients (14 males and 14 females) with the median age of 19 years (17; 23) who had undergone combination treatment (surgery, craniospinal irradiation (35 Gy) with boost to the tumor bed, and polychemotherapy) of extrapituitary brain tumors no later than 2 years before study initiation and 10 healthy volunteers of matching sex and age were examined. All the subjects underwent the GT and IHT with an interval of at least 57 days. The cortisol, ACTH, and glucose levels were measured. RESULTS: Twelve out of 28 patients were diagnosed with SAI according to the IHT results. ROC analysis revealed that cortisol release during the GT 499 nmol/L ruled out SAI [100% sensitivity (Se); 62% specificity (Sp)], while the absence of a rise 340 nmol/l verified SAI (Sp 100%; 55% Se). For GT, the area under a curve (AUC) was 93.6%, which corresponds to a very good diagnostic informativity. In 19 patients, the IHT and GT results were concordant (in ten patients, the release of cortisol occurred above the cut-off value in both tests; no release was detected in nine patients). In nine cases, the results were discordant: the maximum cortisol level detected in the GT was 500 nmol/l, but the IHT results ruled out SAI (the GT yielded a false positive outcome). Contrariwise, in three (10.7%) patients the release of cortisol detected in the GT was adequate, while being insufficient in the IHT test. Adverse events (nausea) were reported during the GT test in 9 (25%) subjects; one patient had hypoglycemia (1.8 mmol/l). CONCLUSION: GT is highly informative and can be used as a first-level stimulation test for ruling out SAI in patients exposed to craniospinal irradiation performed to manage brain tumors. The cortisol level of 500 nmol/L is the best cut-off value for ruling out SAI according to the GT results. The insulin hypoglycemia test is used as the second-level supporting test in patients with positive GT results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A peak of cortisol during the glucagon stimulation test above 18.1 μg/dL (500 nmol/L) ruled out secondary adrenal insufficiency (100% sensitivity), while a peak below 12.2 μg/dL (340 nmol/L) was diagnostic.”
From ACTH Stimulation Test for the Diagnosis of Secondary Adrenal Insufficiency: Light and Shadow (2023) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“However, several patients had discordant results (32.2%) between the glucagon stimulation test and insulin tolerance test, and 25% experienced adverse events during the procedure [33].”
From ACTH Stimulation Test for the Diagnosis of Secondary Adrenal Insufficiency: Light and Shadow (2023) · cites this paper as [33]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hormonal Replacement in Hypopituitarism in Adults: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline
Fleseriu, M., Hashim, I. A., Karavitaki, N., Melmed, S., Murad, M. H., Salvatori, R., & Samuels, M. H. (2016) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2016-2118 · Cited by 945
Leong, K. S., Walker, A. B., Martin, I., Wile, D., Wilding, J., & MacFarlane, I. A. (2001) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2265.2001.01169.x · Cited by 140
Pfeifer, M., Kanc, K., Verhovec, R., & Kocijančič, A. (2001) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2265.2001.01179.x · Cited by 71
Simsek, Y., Karaca, Z., Tanriverdi, F., Unluhizarci, K., Selcuklu, A., & Kelestimur, F. (2015) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/cen.12528 · Cited by 64
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- 10.1210/jc.2002-021994 · DOI
- 10.1055/s-2007-979000 · DOI
- 10.1210/jc.2010-0982 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1210/jc.2005-1525 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11102-012-0407-7 · DOI
- 10.1111/cen.12043 · DOI
- 10.1530/EJE-09-0824 · DOI
- 10.1210/jc.2009-2697 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11102-010-0270-3 · DOI
- 10.1515/JPEM.2005.18.5.433 · DOI
- 10.1507/endocrj.EJ18-0147 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11102-016-0712-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1159/000365190 · DOI
Cited by
ACTH Stimulation Test for the Diagnosis of Secondary Adrenal Insufficiency: Light and Shadow
Birtolo, M. F., Antonini, S., Saladino, A., Zampetti, B., Lavezzi, E., Chiodini, I., Mazziotti, G., Lania, A. G. A., & Cozzi, R. (2023) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines11030904 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Yudina, A. E., Pavlova, M. G., Sotnikov, V. M., Tselovalnikova, T. Y., Mazerkina, N. A., Zheludkova, O. G., Gerasimov, A. N., Teryaeva, N. B., Martynova, E., & Kim, E. I.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Problems of Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Endocrinology Research Centre
- Published
- 2019-12-25
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 227-235
- ISSN
- 2308-1430
- 0375-9660
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 4
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The glucagon test in diagnosis of secondary adrenal insufficiency after craniospinal irradiation: the feasibility of application, the features of performing the test, and its diagnostic informativity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14341/probl10219
- The paper
- Yudina, A. E., Pavlova, M. G., Sotnikov, V. M., Tselovalnikova, T. Y., Mazerkina, N. A., Zheludkova, O. G., Gerasimov, A. N., Teryaeva, N. B., Martynova, E., & Kim, E. I. (2019). The glucagon test in diagnosis of secondary adrenal insufficiency after craniospinal irradiation: the feasibility of application, the features of performing the test, and its diagnostic informativity. Problems of Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.14341/probl10219
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.