The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Development of A New Methodology for Evaluating Nuclear Safety Culture
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Some methodologies are widespread worldwide to assess safety culture.The most generally known are the US NRC methodology [45] and GRS [46], but some other methodologies [47] have been developed in other countries, too.”
From Approaching Nuclear Safety Culture in Fission and Fusion Technology (2021) · cites this paper as [47]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- 2001, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 74, 147, 10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00068-0 · DOI
- 1997, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 26, 231
- 2008, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 93, 578, 10.1016/j.ress.2007.02.003 · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2007.02.003
Metadata
- Authors
- Jae, M., & Han, K.
- Venue
- Journal of the Korean Society of Safety
- Publisher
- The Korean Society of Safety
- Published
- 2015-08-31
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 174-180
- ISSN
- 1738-3803
- Cited by
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of A New Methodology for Evaluating Nuclear Safety Culture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14346/jkosos.2015.30.4.174
- The paper
- Jae, M., & Han, K. (2015). Development of A New Methodology for Evaluating Nuclear Safety Culture. Journal of the Korean Society of Safety. https://doi.org/10.14346/jkosos.2015.30.4.174
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
