Cited by 38Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceStalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

Abuso online en el noviazgo y su relación con el abuso del móvil, la aceptación de la violencia y los mitos sobre el amor

Open access
Villora, Beatriz, Yubero, Santiago, Navarro, Raúl, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha·2019·Suma Psicológica

Abstract

The present study aimed to analyze the prevalence, and the differences in the fre quency and chronicity of cyber dating abuse according to different sociodemographic variables. Additionally, the relationship of cyber dating abuse with the myths of romantic love, mobile abuse and acceptance of violence was analyzed. Using a sample of 1,657 university students, the results revealed that 43.3% of the respondents were perpetrators and 42% were victims of at least one behavior of dating online abuse during the last 12 months. Significant differences were found in cyber dating abuse according to sex, age, sexual orientation, family income and parent's educational level. Finally, the results revealed a significant relationship between cy ber dating abuse, mobile abuse, the myths of romantic love, and the acceptance of violence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14349/sumapsi.2019.v26.n1.6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tolerant attitudes toward abuse can contribute to explaining situations of dating violence victimization.

    “tolerant attitudes toward abuse can contribute to explaining not only violence perpetration, but also situations of dating violence victimization.”
  • Víllora et al. (2019) observed positive and significant relationships between attitudes justifying the use of violence in romantic relationships and CDV victimization.

    “Víllora et al. (2019) observed positive and significant relationships between attitudes justifying the use of violence in romantic relationships and CDV victimization.”
  • Previous studies have found a relationship between adolescents' beliefs in some romantic myths linking love with jealousy and control and their greater involvement in CDV, especially cyber-control behaviors.

    “previous studies have found a relationship between adolescents' beliefs in some romantic myths linking love with jealousy and control and their greater involvement in CDV, especially cyber-control behaviors”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Villora, B., Yubero, S., Navarro, R., Mancha, U. D. C.-L., Mancha, U. D. C.-L., & Mancha, U. D. C.-L.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
  • University of Castilla-La Mancha (ES)
Venue
Suma Psicológica
Published
2019-05-30
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
37-45
ISSN
0121-4381 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2944113580
Cited by
38
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Locations
  • Suma Psicológica (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
  • RUIdeRA - Institutional University Repository (University of Castilla-La Mancha) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
cyber dating abuse, acceptance of violence, romantic relationships, university students, sociodemographic differences, abuse prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review