Cited by 93Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsStalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment

Social media, cyber-aggression and student mental health on a university campus

Mishna, Faye, Regehr, Cheryl, Lacombe-Duncan, Ashley, Daciuk, Joanne, Fearing, Gwendolyn, Van Wert, Melissa·2018·Journal of Mental Health

Abstract

AIM: Information and communication technologies (ICTs) offer immense benefits for university students including enhancing engagement and connections with others and promoting self-directed and interactive learning. Perceived anonymity and the absence of social cues, however, may contribute to risk of interpersonal aggression. While extensive research examines bullying in child and adolescent educational settings, this study addresses a gap regarding post-secondary environments. METHODS: An internet-based survey was provided to 5004 university students to examine the nature, extent and consequences of cyber-aggression. The survey received a response from 1350 students, a response rate of 28.5%. To enable further exploration, nine focus groups and eight individual interviews were conducted. RESULTS: This exploratory study found one quarter of respondents had a private video or photo shared without their permission and 28% were sent angry, vulgar, threatening or intimating messages. Perpetrators were most likely to be a friend (50%), another student (20%) or an intimate partner (18%). Focus group data revealed risks of ICTs and the need for resources and support to address students' wellbeing in the context of cyber-aggression. CONCLUSION: Cyber-aggression is experienced by a significant minority of university students, impacting their sense of wellbeing and mental health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09638237.2018.1437607

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mishna, F., Regehr, C., Lacombe-Duncan, A., Daciuk, J., Fearing, G., & Van Wert, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • ,
Corresponding author
Mishna, Faye
Venue
Journal of Mental Health
Published
2018-02-15
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
222-229
ISSN
  • 0963-8237 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0567
OpenAlex
W2792436963
Cited by
93
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4
FWCI
12.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Keywords
online aggression, university students, student mental health, social media, cyberbullying, information and communication technologies, perceived anonymity, student well-being, postsecondary education
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Students, Universities, Young Adult, Bullying, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review