The Effect of a Design Thinking-based Maker Education Program on the Creative Problem Solving Ability of Elementary School Students
Abstract
최근 4차 산업혁명의 핵심 영역 중 하나로 메이커 운동(maker movement)이 떠오르고 있다. 메이커 운동은 오픈소스 소프트웨어 및 하드웨어, 3D 프린터, 레이저 커팅기 등 다양하고 저렴한 제작 도구를 이용하여 사용자 가 필요한 물건을 직접 제작하고 공유하는 것이다. 메이커 교육을 초․중등(K-12) 수업에 적용할 때 디자인 사 고를 기반으로 한다면 그 효과가 증진될 것으로 생각한다. 본 연구의 목적은 디자인 사고 기반 메이커 교육 프 로그램을 개발하고 수업에 적용하여 초등학생의 창의적 문제해결력에 미치는 영향을 밝히는 것이다. 연구 내용 을 검증하기 위해 초등학교 5～6학년 학생을 통제집단과 실험집단으로 나누고 통제집단에는 일반적인 강의식 메 이커 수업을 적용하였고, 실험집단에는 개발된 디자인 사고 기반의 메이커 수업을 적용하였다. 창의적 문제해결 력 검사를 사전, 사후 실시하였고, 통계적 t-검정을 이용하여 그 효과성을 검증하였다. 결론적으로 본 연구를 통 해 디자인 사고 기반 메이커 교육 프로그램은 초등학생의 창의적 문제해결력에 긍정적인 영향이 있음을 밝혔다.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several studies recommend employing Design Thinking as a methodology to structure Maker project-based learning activities in early education.
“When integrating Making into early education, several studies recommend employing Design Thinking as a methodology to structure Maker project-based learning activities (Smith et al., 2015;Lee et al., 2019;Yoon & Kang, 2021;Veldhuis et al., 2021;Xu et al., 2023).”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Santos, P., El Aadmi, K., Calvera-Isabal, M., & Rodríguez, A. (2025) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-025-10001-6 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“When integrating Making into early education, several studies recommend employing Design Thinking as a methodology to structure Maker project-based learning activities (Smith et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2019; Yoon & Kang, 2021; Veldhuis et al., 2021; Xu et al., 2023).”
Maker Education in Primary Education: Changes in Students’ Maker-Mindset and Gender Differences
Martínez Moreno, J., Santos, P., & Hernandez-Leo, D. (2021) · Ninth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM'21) · doi:10.1145/3486011.3486431 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“Through the combination of Maker activities and Design Thinking, relevant aptitudes such as creativity, problem solving and Computational Thinking can be developed beyond more specific STEM skills [22, 23].”
MethodKim, S.-W. (2026) · The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education · doi:10.32431/kace.2026.29.1.011 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Meta-Analysis of Cognitive and Affective Effects of Arduino- Based Educational Programs
Jang, B. S. (2024) · Journal of information and communication convergence engineering · doi:10.56977/jicce.2024.22.2.153
The Importance of Design Thinking for Students Majoring in Art and Design in Vocational Colleges
Zhou, Z., & Jeong, D. (2024) · Journal of Educational Research and Policies · doi:10.53469/jerp.2024.06(12).32
- Authors
- 컴퓨터교육과, 한., Lee, S., Kim, T., Kim, J., Kang, S., & Yoon, J.
- ORCID
- Yoon, Jihyun
- Venue
- Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education
- Published
- 2019-02-28
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-84
- ISSN
- 1229-3245 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2922448887
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Keywords
- design thinking, maker education, creative problem solving, elementary school students, maker culture, 3D printing, educational program development, Fourth Industrial Revolution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
