The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Photogrammetric and Lidar Data Registration Using Linear Features
Open accessAbstract
The enormous increase in the volume of datasets acquired by lidar systems is leading towards their extensive exploitation in a variety of applications, such as, surface reconstruction, city modeling, and generation of perspective views. Though being a fairly new technology, lidar has been influenced by and had a significant impact on photogrammetry. Such an influence or impact can be attributed to the complementary nature of the information provided by the two systems. For example, photogrammetric processing of imagery produces accurate information regarding object space break lines (discontinuities). On the other hand, lidar provides accurate information describing homogeneous physical surfaces. Hence, it proves logical to combine data from the two sensors to arrive at a more robust and complete reconstruction of 3D objects. This paper introduces alternative approaches for the registration of data captured by photogrammetric and lidar systems to a common reference frame. The first approach incorporates lidar features as control for establishing the datum in the photogrammetric bundle adjustment. The second approach starts by manipulating the photogrammetric imagery to produce a 3D model, including a set of linear features along object space discontinuities, relative to an arbitrarily chosen coordinate system. Afterwards, conjugate photogrammetric and lidar straight-line features are used to establish the transformation between the arbitrarily chosen photogrammetric coordinate system and the lidar reference frame. The second approach (bundle adjustment, followed by similarity transformation) is general enough to be applied for the co-registration of multiple three-dimensional datasets regardless of their origin (e.g., adjacent lidar strips, surfaces in GIS databases, and temporal elevation data). The registration procedure would allow for the identification of inconsistencies between the surfaces in question. Such inconsistencies might arise from changes taking place within the object space or inaccurate calibration of the internal characteristics of the lidar and the photogrammetric systems. Therefore, the proposed methodology is useful for change detection and system calibration applications. Experimental results from aerial and terrestrial datasets proved the feasibility of the suggested methodologies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ground Filtering Algorithms for Airborne LiDAR Data: A Review of Critical Issues
Meng, X., Currit, N., & Zhao, K. (2010) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs2030833 · Cited by 573
New Frontiers in IoT: Networking, Systems, Reliability, and Security Challenges
Bagchi, S., Abdelzaher, T. F., Govindan, R., Shenoy, P., Atrey, A., Ghosh, P., & Xu, R. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.3007690 · Cited by 72
Sekar, K., Shah, S. A., & Antony Athithan, A. (2021) · IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/1128/1/012010 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Habib, A., Ghanma, M., Morgan, M., & Al-Ruzouq, R.
- Venue
- Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2005-06-01
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 699-707
- ISSN
- 0099-1112 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008245841
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Photogrammetric and Lidar Data Registration Using Linear Features. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14358/pers.71.6.699
- The paper
- Habib, A., Ghanma, M., Morgan, M., & Al-Ruzouq, R. (2005). Photogrammetric and Lidar Data Registration Using Linear Features. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.14358/pers.71.6.699
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.