Cited by 3Reliability and Maintenance OptimizationMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesEngineering and Test Systems

Reviewing the Challenges in Maintaining the Reliability and Accuracy of IOT Systems for Remaining Useful Life Prediction

Open access
Sekar, Kalaiarasan, Shah, Shahani Aman, Antony Athithan, A·2021·IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering

Abstract

Internet of things (IoT) has been implemented in aviation predictive maintenance in recent years for the enhancement of better maintenance prediction, to reduce downtime, unnecessary maintenance actions, increase safety, increase system readiness, and refine the management process and to improve component design. The IoT system in predictive maintenance is very optimistic in gathering and analysing, predicting the component failures and to determine the remaining useful life of a systems. Since Remaining useful life of an system is defines as the length from the current time to the end of its useful life. Due to its futuristic increasing demand of IoT in aviation maintenance, the biggest challenge is to ensuring the reliability and accuracy of any specific IoT system allotted for monitoring aircraft components in the near future. Hence, this review paper clearly explains the challenges associated with IoT systems on predicting Remaining useful life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1757-899x/1128/1/012010

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Siemens introduced MindSphere in 2016 as a commercial IIoT service, forming the core of its IIoT strategy.

    “Siemens is a remarkable example of a business embracing IIoT, with its platform brand, MindSphere, introduced in 2016 as a commercial IIoT service catering not only to manufacturing customers but also extending its reach beyond, forming the core of the company's IIoT strategy [29].”

    From A Critical Overview of Industrial Internet of Things Security and Privacy Issues Using a Layer-Based Hacking Scenario (2023) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Introduction discusses IoT reliability and remaining-useful-life prediction, while the retrieved References passages list related IoT studies (pp. 11–12). Searches for MindSphere, Siemens, its 2016 introduction, and its IIoT strategy found no passage in our copy addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Xiongzi, C., Jinsong, Y., Diyin, T. and Yingxun, W., 2011, August. Remaining useful life prognostic estimation for aircraft subsystems or components: A review. In IEEE 2011 10th International Conference on Electronic Measurement & Instruments (Vol. 2, pp. 94-98). IEEE. IConACES 2020 IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 1128 (2021) 012010 IOP Publishing doi:10.1088/1757-899X/1128/1/012010 11 · DOI
  2. Costa, B., Pires, P.F., Delicato, F.C., Li, W. and Zomaya, A.Y., 2016, August. Design and analysis of IoT applications: a model-driven approach. In 2016 IEEE 14th Intl Conf on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, 14th Intl Conf on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, 2nd Intl Conf on Big Data Intelligence and Computing and Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/DataCom/CyberSciTech) (pp. 392-399). IEEE.
  3. Sharma, B., Sharma, L. and Lal, C., 2019, December. Anomaly Detection Techniques using Deep Learning in IoT: A Survey. In 2019 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Knowledge Economy (ICCIKE) (pp. 146-149). IEEE.
  4. Kempf, J., Arkko, J., Beheshti, N. and Yedavalli, K., 2011, March. Thoughts on reliability in the internet of things. In Interconnecting smart objects with the Internet workshop (Vol. 1, pp. 1-4).
  5. Darwish, D., 2015. Improved layered architecture for Internet of Things. Int. J. Comput. Acad. Res.(IJCAR), 4, pp.214-223.
  6. Bellekens, B., Spruyt, V., Berkvens, R., Penne, R. and Weyn, M., 2015. A benchmark survey of rigid 3D point cloud registration algorithms. Int. J. Adv. Intell. Syst, 8, pp.118-127.
  7. Ahmad, M., 2014, November. Reliability models for the internet of things: A paradigm shift. In 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (pp. 52-59). IEEE.
  8. Maalel, N., Natalizio, E., Bouabdallah, A., Roux, P. and Kellil, M., 2013, May. Reliability for emergency applications in internet of things. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (pp. 361-366). IEEE.
  9. Kamyod, C., 2018, February. End-to-end reliability analysis of an IoT based smart agriculture. In 2018 International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology (ICDAMT) (pp. 258- 261). IEEE.
  10. Li, S. and Huang, J., 2017, June. GSPN-based reliability-aware performance evaluation of IoT services. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC) (pp. 483-486). IEEE.
  11. Sinche, S., Polo, O., Raposo, D., Femandes, M., Boavida, F., Rodrigues, A., Pereira, V. and Silva, J.S., 2018, June. Assessing redundancy models for IoT reliability. In 2018 IEEE 19th International Symposium on" A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks"(WoWMoM) (pp. 14-15). IEEE.
  12. Brito, R., Carvalho, A. and Gericota, M., 2015, June. A new three-phase voltage sourced converter laplace model. In 2015 9th International Conference on Compatibility and Power Electronics (CPE) (pp. 160-166). IEEE.
  13. Pradhan, P., Nagananda, K., Venkitasubramaniam, P., Kishore, S. and Blum, R.S., 2016, IConACES 2020 IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 1128 (2021) 012010 IOP Publishing doi:10.1088/1757-899X/1128/1/012010
  14. Gao, Y.L., An, X.H. and Liu, J.M., 2008, December. A particle swarm optimization algorithm with logarithm decreasing inertia weight and chaos mutation. In 2008 international conference on computational intelligence and security (Vol. 1, pp. 61-65). IEEE.
  15. Tran, T.T., Shin, O.S. and Lee, J.H., 2013, January. Detection of replay attacks in smart grid systems. In 2013 International Conference on Computing, Management and Telecommunications (ComManTel) (pp. 298-302). IEEE.
  16. Guo, Y., Ten, C.W., Hu, S. and Weaver, W.W., 2015, February. Modeling distributed denial of service attack in advanced metering infrastructure. In 2015 IEEE power & energy society innovative smart grid technologies conference (ISGT) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
  17. Sha, K., Wei, W., Yang, T.A., Wang, Z. and Shi, W., 2018. On security challenges and open issues in Internet of Things. Future Generation Computer Systems, 83, pp.326-337.
  18. Salunkhe, T., Jamadar, N.I. and Kivade, S.B., 2014. Prediction of Remaining Useful Life of mechanical components-a Review. International Journal of Engineering Science and Innovative Technology (IJESIT), 3(6), pp.125-135.
  19. Dalal, K.R., 2020, July. Analysing the Role of Supervised and Unsupervised Machine Learning in IoT. In 2020 International Conference on Electronics and Sustainable Communication Systems (ICESC) (pp. 75-79). IEEE.
  20. Shanthamallu, U.S., Spanias, A., Tepedelenlioglu, C. and Stanley, M., 2017, August. A brief survey of machine learning methods and their sensor and IoT applications. In 2017 8th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA) (pp. 1- 8). IEEE.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sekar, K., Shah, S. A., & Antony Athithan, A.
Affiliations
  • Lincoln University College (MY)
  • University of Kuala Lumpur (MY)
Corresponding author
Shah, Shahani Aman
Venue
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
Published
2021-04-01
Volume
1128
Issue
1
Pages
012010
ISSN
  • 1757-8981 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-899X
OpenAlex
W3157907792
Cited by
3
References
43
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.84
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Engineering and Test Systems
Keywords
Internet of Things, remaining useful life prediction, system reliability, prediction accuracy, component failure prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review