The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Medical Discourses and Practices in Contemporary Japanese Religions
Open accessAbstract
Monika Schrimpf widmet sich in ihrem Beitrag der Frage, wie religiöse AkteurInnen im gegenwärtigen Japan ihre therapeutische Praxis bzw. die Propagierung religiös-therapeutischer Praktiken legitimieren und sich an der Schnittstelle zwischen Religion und Medizin positionieren. Am Beispiel eines Nichiren-buddhistischen Priesters und der Neureligion Perfect Liberty Kyodan werden zwei Strategien der Legitimierung und Positionierung illustriert: die Berufung auf Wissenschaft sowie das Code-Switching zwischen religiöser und medizinischer Semantik.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“individual and institutional religious actors-often belonging to new or marginalized religious groups-are still active in healing in modern Japan$^{6}$^{3} and other modern societies.”
From Distinctions and Differentiations between Medicine and Religion (2020) · cites this paper as Schrimpf 2018
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Distinctions and Differentiations between Medicine and Religion
Killinger, K., Kleine, C., & Triplett, K. (2020) · Asian Medicine · doi:10.1163/15734218-12341452 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Schrimpf, M.
- Corresponding author
- Schrimpf, Monika
- Venue
- Religionswissenschaft
- Publisher
- transcript Verlag
- Published
- 2018-10-18
- Pages
- 57-90
- ISSN
- 2703-142X (ISSN-L)
- 2703-1438
- OpenAlex
- W2899225655
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Religionswissenschaft (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- transcript Verlag eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Keywords
- religion and medicine, therapeutic practice, legitimation strategies, Nichiren Buddhism, new religious movements, code-switching, religious discourse, Japanese religion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Medical Discourses and Practices in Contemporary Japanese Religions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14361/9783839445822-004
- The paper
- Schrimpf, M. (2018). Medical Discourses and Practices in Contemporary Japanese Religions. Religionswissenschaft. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839445822-004
