Cited by 36Speech Recognition and SynthesisSpeech and Audio ProcessingSpeech and dialogue systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Speech synthesis systems: disadvantages and limitations

Open access
Kuligowska, Karolina, Kisielewicz, Paweł, Włodarz, Aleksandra·2018·International Journal of Engineering & Technology

Abstract

The present speech synthesis systems can be successfully used for a wide range of diverse purposes. However, there are serious and important limitations in using various synthesizers. Many of these problems can be identified and resolved. The aim of this paper is to present the current state of development of speech synthesis systems and to examine their drawbacks and limitations. The paper dis-cusses the current classification, construction and functioning of speech synthesis systems, which gives an insight into synthesizers implemented so far. The analysis of disadvantages and limitations of speech synthesis systems focuses on identification of weak points of these systems, namely: the impact of emotions and prosody, spontaneous speech in terms of naturalness and intelligibility, preprocessing and text analysis, problem of ambiguity, natural sounding, adaptation to the situation, variety of systems, sparsely spoken languages, speech synthesis for older people, and some other minor limitations. Solving these problems stimulates further development of speech synthesis domain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14419/ijet.v7i2.28.12933

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

3 more claims about this paper

Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.

See all claims — free account

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. [6]6. Chandra E., Akila A., "An Overview of Speech Recognition and Speech Synthesis Algorithms", International Journal of Computer Technology and Applications, Vol.3, Issue 4, 2012, 1427.
  2. [7]7. Chauhan A., Chauhan V., Singh G., Choudhary C., Arya P., "De- sign and Development of a Text-To-Speech Synthesizer System", International Journal of Electronics and Communication Technol- ogy, Vol. 2, Issue 3, 2011, 42 -44.
  3. [8]8. Demenko G., Wagner A. (eds.), Speech and Language Technology, vol. 14/15, Polskie Towarzystwo Fonetyczne, Poznań 2012, 32.
  4. [9]9. Gruhn R.E., Minker W., Nakamura S., Statistical Pronunciation Modeling for Non-Native Speech Processing, Signals and Commu- nication Technology, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, 15 -17.
  5. [12]12. Indumathi A., Chandra E., "Survey on Speech Synthesis", Signal Processing: An International Journal -SPIJ, Vol. 6, Issue 5, 2012, 140 -145.
  6. [13]13. Kacprzak S., "Inteligentne metody rozpoznawania dźwięku", master's thesis, Wydział Fizyki Technicznej i Matematyki Stosowanej Politechniki Łódzkiej, Łódź 2010, 13.
  7. [15]15. Demenko G., Wagner A. (eds.), Speech and Lan- guage Technology, vol. 14/15, Polskie Towarzystwo Fonetyczne, Poznań 2012, 32 -35.
  8. [16]16. Nabożny A., "Przygotowanie korpusu do projektu korpusowego syntezatora mowy", engineering thesis, Wydział Inżynierii Mechanicznej i Robotyki Akademii Górniczo-Hutniczej, Kraków 2014, 14 -18.
  9. [19]19. Padda S., Bhalla N., Kaur R., "A Step towards Making an Effective Text to speech Conversion System", International Journal of Engi- neering Research and Applications, vol. 2, issue 2, 2012, 1242 - 1244.
  10. [33]33. Szklanny K., "System korpusowej syntezy mowy dla języka pol- skiego", [in:] XI International PhD Workshop OWD 2009, Confer- ence Archives PTETiS, Vol. 26, Wisła 2009, 235 -240.
  11. [36]36. Taylor P., Text-to-Speech Synthesis, Cambridge University Press, 2009, 1 -50.
  12. [37]37. Thakur B.K., Chettri B., Shah K.B., "Current Trends, Frameworks and Techniques Used in Speech Synthesis -A Survey", Interna- tional Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering IJSCE, Volume 2, Issue 2, 2012, 444 -445.
  13. [39]39. Wagner A., "A comprehensive model of intonation for application in speech synthesis", doctoral dissertation, Wydział Neofilologii Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, Poznań 2008, 129 -137.
  14. [44]44. Nahamoo D., Picheny M., (eds.), 2011 IEEE Workshop on Auto- matic Speech Recognition Understanding, ASRU 2011, 289.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kuligowska, K., Kisielewicz, P., & Włodarz, A.
Affiliations
University of Warsaw (PL)
Venue
International Journal of Engineering & Technology
Published
2018-05-16
Volume
7
Issue
2.28
Pages
234
ISSN
2227-524X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2940855867
Cited by
36
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Engineering & Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
speech synthesis, prosody, emotion in speech, naturalness, intelligibility, text preprocessing, text analysis, ambiguity, low-resource languages

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review