Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Life Expectancy of Female Cancer Patients at Tehrans Dehshpour Institute in 2015
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) increases the psychological exibility of people afflicted with cancer, and consequently improves their adaptability. The present research was conducted with the aim of determining the effectiveness of ACT for people afflicted with cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present research was of semi-pilot type with a pre-test and post-test plan for the proof group. The demographics of the community were composed of all the women with cancer who were under treatment in Tehran's Dehshpour therapeutic center in 2015. The sample was composed of 24 people who were selected as available and chosen randomly in two groups of test and proof. All the participants responded to Snyder questionnaire in two pre-test and post-test stages, and the test group participated in treatment sessions after conducting the pre-test. RESULTS: After collecting the information, data analysis was conducted in two description and inferential levels. The test results of covariance analysis showed that the two groups' hope was meaningfully different. Hope in the test group, compared to the proof group, increased meaningfully. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the ACT is effective in increasing hope of patients with cancer.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The increase in hopefulness is consistent with research that found benefits of an ACT intervention with cancer patients.
“The increase in hopefulness is consistent with research that found benefits of an ACT intervention with cancer patients (Ghasemi, Dehghan, Farnia, Tatari, & Alikhani, 2016).”
From Brief group‐based acceptance and commitment therapy for stroke survivors. (2019) · cites this paper as Ghasemi et al., 2016
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gallagher, M. W., Long, L. J., & Phillips, C. A. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22882 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Brief group‐based acceptance and commitment therapy for stroke survivors.
Majumdar, S., & Morris, R. (2019) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjc.12198 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Zhao, C., Lai, L., Zhang, L., Cai, Z., Ren, Z., Shi, C., Luo, W., & Yan, Y. (2021) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110304 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Hulbert-Williams, N. J., Beatty, L., & Dhillon, H. M. (2018) · Current Opinion in Supportive & Palliative Care · doi:10.1097/spc.0000000000000360 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Li, H., Wu, J., Ni, Q., Zhang, J., Wang, Y., & He, G. (2021) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/nnr.0000000000000499 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Han, J., Liu, J.-E., Su, Y.-L., & Qiu, H. (2019) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.09.003 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Luo, J., Li, L., Reangsing, C., & Schneider, J. K. (2022) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12529-021-10051-9 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Kanser Tanısı Olan Kişilerde Kabul ve Kararlılık Terapisi Uygulamaları: Sistematik Bir Derleme
Baş, S., & Dirik, G. (2019) · Psikoloji Çalışmaları / Studies in Psychology · doi:10.26650/sp2019-0025 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
(2019) · International journal of body, mind and culture · doi:10.22122/ijbmc.v6i4.178 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Hernández-Marín, J., Galindo-Vázquez, Ó., Calderillo-Ruíz, G., Montero-Pardo, X., Costas-Muñiz, R., & Ortega-Andeane, P. (2022) · Psicooncologia · doi:10.5209/psic.84042 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Psychological intervention in breast cancer pathology
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, U. O. B., IORDĂCHESCU, D.-A., PAICA, C.-I., Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, U. O. B., VLADISLAV, E.-O., Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, U. O. B., GICĂ, C., “Filantropia” Clinical Hospital, B., BOTEZATU, R., “Filantropia” Clinical Hospital, B., et al. (2021) · Romanian Journal of Medical Practice · doi:10.37897/rjmp.2021.s3.4 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Einbeigi, A., Soleimanian, A. A., & Jajarmi, M. (2021) · Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences · doi:10.52547/nkums.13.1.85 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Interventions to Increase Hope in Adult Patients with Cancer: Scoping Review
Alfons, D. W. A., & Rochmawati, E. (2021) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
McLaughlin, S. A., & Lessmann, A. W. (1998)
Hedayatian, N., & Ebrahimi, M. E. (2024) · doi:10.61838/kman.aftj.5.3.14
- Authors
- Ghasemi, F., & Alikhani, F. D. V. F. F. T. M.
- Affiliations
- Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- ORCID
- Ghasemi, Farahnaz
- Venue
- APJCP
- Publisher
- APJCP
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4113-6
- OpenAlex
- W2539000045
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 2.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- NRCT Data Center
- PubMed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- Keywords
- acceptance and commitment therapy, cancer patients, women, hope, life expectancy, psychological flexibility, psycho-oncology
- MeSH terms
- Academies and Institutes, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Female, Humans, Iran, Life Expectancy, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Pilot Projects, Treatment Outcome, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
