Cited by 30Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and ManagementInfectious Aortic and Vascular ConditionsCardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair

Bacterial Endocarditis Caused by Lactobacillus acidophilus Leading to Rupture of Sinus of Valsalva Aneurysm

Open access
Encarnacion, Carlos Omar, Loranger, Austin Mitchell, Bharatkumar, A.G., Almassi, G. Hossein·2016·Texas Heart Institute Journal

Abstract

Lactobacillus acidophilus rarely causes bacterial endocarditis, because it usually resides in the mucosa of the vagina, gastrointestinal tract, and oropharynx. Moreover, sinus of Valsalva aneurysms are rare cardiac anomalies, either acquired or congenital. We present the case of a middle-aged man whose bacterial endocarditis, caused by Lactobacillus acidophilus, led to an aneurysmal rupture of the sinus of Valsalva into the right ventricular outflow tract. The patient underwent successful surgical repair, despite numerous complications and sequelae.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14503/thij-15-5121

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adverse events from probiotic strains in vulnerable populations include life-threatening pneumonia, endocarditis, and sepsis.

    “AEs include life-threatening pneumonia,106 endocarditis,107–111 and sepsis.112–115”

    From Emerging issues in probiotic safety: 2023 perspectives (2023) · cites this paper as [110]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. See JRH, Czachor JS, Brown GR. Lactobacillus endocarditis: case report and literature review. Infect Dis Clin Prac 2006;14 (3):134-6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Encarnacion, C. O., Loranger, A. M., Bharatkumar, A. G., & Almassi, G. H.
Affiliations
Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Venue
Texas Heart Institute Journal
Published
2016-04
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
161-164
ISSN
  • 0730-2347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-6702
OpenAlex
W2322682843
Cited by
30
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4
FWCI
4.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Texas Heart Institute Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Infectious Aortic and Vascular Conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
Keywords
bacterial endocarditis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, sinus of Valsalva aneurysm, aneurysm rupture, right ventricular outflow tract, infective endocarditis, surgical repair, cardiac anomalies
MeSH terms
Aortic Rupture, Echocardiography, Endocarditis, Bacterial, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Humans, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Male, Middle Aged, Sinus of Valsalva, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review