The DOI matches its Crossref record.
What Do Test Scores in Texas Tell Us?
Open accessAbstract
We examine the results on the Texas Assessment of Academic Skills (TAAS), the highest-profile state testing program and one that has recorded extraordinary recent gains in math and reading scores. To investigate whether the dramatic math and reading gains on the TAAS represent actual academic progress, we have compared these gains to score changes in Texas on another test, the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Texas students did improve significantly more on a fourth-grade NAEP math test than their counterparts nationally. But, the size of this gain was smaller than their gains on TAAS and was not present on the eighth-grade math test. The stark differences between the stories told by NAEP and TAAS are especially striking when it comes to the gap in average scores between whites and students of color. According to the NAEP results, that gap in Texas is not only very large but increasing slightly. According to TAAS scores, the gap is much smaller and decreasing greatly. Many schools are devoting a great deal of class time to highly specific TAAS preparation. While this preparation may improve TAAS scores, it may not help students develop necessary reading and math skills. Schools with relatively large percentages of minority and poor students may be doing this more than other schools. We raise serious questions about the validity of those gains, and caution against the danger of making decisions to sanction or reward students, teachers and schools on the basis of test scores that may be inflated or misleading. Finally, we suggest some steps that states can take to increase the likelihood that their test results merit public confidence and provide a sound basis for educational policy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rotten Apples: An Investigation of the Prevalence and Predictors of Teacher Cheating
Jacob, B. A., & Levitt, S. D. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/00335530360698441 · Cited by 878
The Promise and Pitfalls of Using Imprecise School Accountability Measures
Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2002) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/089533002320950993 · Cited by 503
Performance Indicators: Good, Bad, and Ugly
Bird, S. M., Sir David, C., Farewell, V. T., Harvey, G., Tim, H., & Peter C., S. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2004.00333.x · Cited by 377
Views from the Classroom: Teachers' Opinions of Statewide Testing Programs
Abrams, L. M., Pedulla, J. J., & Madaus, G. F. (2003) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4201_4 · Cited by 344
Heilig, J. V., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/0162373708317689 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Klein et al, S. P., Hamilton, L., McCaffrey, D. F., & Stecher, B.
- Venue
- Education Policy Analysis Archives
- Published
- 2000-10-26
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 49
- ISSN
- 1068-2341 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2113287099
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 58.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What Do Test Scores in Texas Tell Us? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14507/epaa.v8n49.2000
- The paper
- Klein et al, S. P., Hamilton, L., McCaffrey, D. F., & Stecher, B. (2000). What Do Test Scores in Texas Tell Us? Education Policy Analysis Archives. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n49.2000
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.