The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sentiment Analysis Using Deep Learning Techniques: A Review
Open accessAbstract
The World Wide Web such as social networks, forums, review sites and blogs generate enormous heaps of data in the form of users views, emotions, opinions and arguments about different social events, products, brands, and politics. Sentiments of users that are expressed on the web has great influence on the readers, product vendors and politicians. The unstructured form of data from the social media is needed to be analyzed and well-structured and for this purpose, sentiment analysis has recognized significant attention. Sentiment analysis is referred as text organization that is used to classify the expressed mind-set or feelings in different manners such as negative, positive, favorable, unfavorable, thumbs up, thumbs down, etc. The challenge for sentiment analysis is lack of sufficient labeled data in the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP). And to solve this issue, the sentiment analysis and deep learning techniques have been merged because deep learning models are effective due to their automatic learning capability. This Review Paper highlights latest studies regarding the implementation of deep learning models such as deep neural networks, convolutional neural networks and many more for solving different problems of sentiment analysis such as sentiment classification, cross lingual problems, textual and visual analysis and product review analysis, etc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781 · Cited by 26,568
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.4546 · Cited by 24,533
Deep learning for visual understanding: A review
Guo, Y., Liu, Y., Oerlemans, A., Lao, S., Wu, S., & Lew, M. S. (2016) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2015.09.116 · Cited by 2,504
Cited by
A comprehensive review on ensemble deep learning: Opportunities and challenges
Mohammed, A., & Kora, R. (2023) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2023.01.014 · Cited by 1,127
Sentiment Analysis Based on Deep Learning: A Comparative Study
Dang, N. C., Moreno-García, M. N., & De la Prieta, F. (2020) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics9030483 · Cited by 593
An intelligent healthcare monitoring framework using wearable sensors and social networking data
Ali, F., El-Sappagh, S., Islam, S. M. R., Ali, A., Attique, M., Imran, M., & Kwak, K.-S. (2021) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2020.07.047 · Cited by 355
The Political Biases of ChatGPT
Rozado, D. (2023) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci12030148 · Cited by 281
Large Language Models versus Natural Language Understanding and Generation
Karanikolas, N., Manga, E., Samaridi, N., Tousidou, E., & Vassilakopoulos, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the 27th Pan-Hellenic Conference on Progress in Computing and Informatics · doi:10.1145/3635059.3635104 · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Tul, Q., Ali, M., Riaz, A., Noureen, A., Kamranz, M., Hayat, B., & Rehman, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 2156-5570 (ISSN-L)
- 2158-107X
- OpenAlex
- W2733520819
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sentiment Analysis Using Deep Learning Techniques: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14569/ijacsa.2017.080657
- The paper
- Tul, Q., Ali, M., Riaz, A., Noureen, A., Kamranz, M., Hayat, B., & Rehman, A. (2017). Sentiment Analysis Using Deep Learning Techniques: A Review. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2017.080657
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.