Adaptive e-Learning AI-Powered Chatbot based on Multimedia Indexing
Open accessAbstract
With the rapid evolution of e-learning technology, the multiple sources of information become more and more accessible. However, the availability of a wide range of e-learning offers makes it difficult for learners to find the right content for their training needs. In this context, our paper aims to design an e-learning AI-powered Chatbot allowing interaction with learners and suggesting the e-learning content adapted to their needs. In order to achieve these objectives, we first analysed the e-learning multimedia content to extract the maximum amount of information. Then, using Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques, we introduced a new approach to extract keywords. After that, we suggest a new approach for multimedia indexing based on extracted keywords. Finally, the Chatbot architecture is realized based on the multimedia indexing and deployed on online messaging platforms. The suggested approach aims to have an efficient way to represent the multimedia content based on keywords. We compare our approach with approaches in literature and we deduce that the use of keywords on our approach result on a better representation and reduce time to construct multimedia indexing. The core of our Chatbot is based on this indexed multimedia content which enables it to look for the information quickly. Then our designed Chatbot reduce response time and meet the learner’s need.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The study by Janati et al. (2020) reported high effectiveness.
“| (Janati et al., 2020) | Peer agent, chatbot driven | N/A | High effectiveness |”
From Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review (2023) · cites this paper as Janati et al., 2020
The Results report improved multimedia indexing, including an 8% gain in validation-index performance and a 70% reduction in execution time. They do not establish high effectiveness for the chatbot as a whole; the Recommendation section says its functionality is limited for general learner questions. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
1 retracted
Retracted: Generative model chatbot for Human Resource using Deep Learning
Sheikh, S. A., Tiwari, V., & Singhal, S. (2019) · International Conference on Data Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/icdse47409.2019.8971795 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
RetractedEfficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781 · Cited by 26,568 · see citing works
Hinton, G., Deng, L., Yu, D., Dahl, G., Mohamed, A.-R., Jaitly, N., Senior, A., Vanhoucke, V., Nguyen, P., Sainath, T., et al. (2012) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2012.2205597 · Cited by 10,260 · see citing works
Keyword and Keyphrase Extraction Techniques: A Literature Review
Siddiqi, S., & Sharan, A. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Applications · doi:10.5120/19161-0607 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
YAKE! Collection-Independent Automatic Keyword Extractor
Campos, R., Mangaravite, V., Pasquali, A., Jorge, A., Nunes, C., & Jatowt, A. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-76941-7_80 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
A study on automatically extracted keywords in text categorization
Hulth, A., & Megyesi, B. (2006) · doi:10.3115/1220175.1220243 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Why Developers Are Slacking Off: Understanding How Software Teams Use Slack
Lin, B., Zagalsky, A., Storey, M., & Serebrenik, A. (2016) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2818052.2869117 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
DocChat: An Information Retrieval Approach for Chatbot Engines Using Unstructured Documents
Zhao, Y. L., Duan, N., Bao, J., Chen, P., Zhou, M., Li, Z., & Zhou, J. (2016) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-1049 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Rule-based chabot for student enquiries
Singh, J., Joesph, M. H., & Jabbar, K. B. A. (2019) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1228/1/012060 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
EmbedRank: Unsupervised Keyphrase Extraction using Sentence EmbeddingsPreprint
Bennani-Smires, K., Musat, C., Jaggi, M., Hossmann, A., & Baeriswyl, M. (2018) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1801.04470 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Zamora, J. (2017) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3030024.3040201 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Hayati, H., Chanaa, A., Idrissi, M. K., & Bennani, S. (2019) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v14i08.9964 · Cited by 26
Learning Analytics Framework for Adaptive E-learning System to Monitor the Learner’s Activities
Janati, S. E., Maach, A., & El, D. (2019) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2019.0100835 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationSMART Education Framework for Adaptation Content Presentation
Janati, S. E., Maach, A., & Ghanami, D. E. (2018) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2018.01.141
Self-citationEnhancing generative conversational service agents with dialog history and external knowledge
Wang, Z., Wang, Z., Long, Y., Wang, J., Xu, Z., & Wang, B. (2019) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2018.09.003
A Chatbot Design Method Using Combined Model for Business Promotion
Zhang, J., Huang, H., & Gui, G. (2019) · Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-6508-9_137
Amudha, S., & Shanthi, I. E. (2020) · Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-9364-8_21
Havrlant, L., & Kreinovich, V. (2017) · International Journal of General Systems · doi:10.1080/03081079.2017.1291635
An Empirical Evaluation of doc2vec with Practical Insights into Document Embedding Generation
Lau, J. H., & Baldwin, T. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.05368
Sarosa, M., Junus, M., Hoesny, M. U., Sari, Z., & Fatnuriyah, M. (2018) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v13i02.7173
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- El Janati, S., Maach, A., El Ghanami, D., "Context aware in adaptive ubiquitous e-learning system for adaptation presentation content". Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 2019, 97(16), pp. 4424-4438.
- Fernandez, R. R., & Uy, C., "Keywords on Online Video-ads Marketing Campaign: A Sentiment Analysis". Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 2020, vol. 9, p. 99-110.
- Paukkeri M, Honkela T., "Likey: Unsupervised language independent keyphrase extraction". In: Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on semantic evaluation, Uppsala, Sweden, 2010. p. 162-165.
- Mihalcea, R., & Tarau, P., "Textrank: Bringing order into text". In: Proceedings of the 2004 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. 2004. p. 404-411.
- Wan, X., & Xiao, J., "Single Document Keyphrase Extraction Using Neighborhood Knowledge". In: AAAI. 2008. p. 855-860.
- Liu, Z., Huang, W., Zheng, Y., & Sun, M., "Automatic keyphrase extraction via topic decomposition". In: Proceedings of the 2010 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010. p. 366-376.
- Kiros, R., Zhu, Y., Salakhutdinov, R. R., Zemel, R., Urtasun, R., Torralba, A., & Fidler, S., "Skip-thought vectors". In Advances in neural information processing systems, 2015, pp. 3294-3302.
- Nguyen, T. D., & Luong, M. T., "WINGNUS: Keyphrase extraction utilizing document logical structure". In: Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on semantic evaluation. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010. p. 166-169.
- Amodei, D., Ananthanarayanan, S., Anubhai, R, et al., "Deep speech 2: End-to-end speech recognition in english and mandarin". In: International conference on machine learning. 2016. p. 173-182.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review
Kuhail, M. A., Alturki, N., Alramlawi, S., & Alhejori, K. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11177-3 · Cited by 841 · see citing works
Williamson, S. M., & Prybutok, V. (2024) · Information · doi:10.3390/info15060299 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
- Authors
- Janati, S. E., Maach, A., & El, D.
- Affiliations
- Mohammed V University (MA)
- Venue
- International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 12
- ISSN
- 2156-5570 (ISSN-L)
- 2158-107X
- OpenAlex
- W3119013717
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Multimedia Learning Systems
- Keywords
- adaptive e-learning, multimedia indexing, keyword extraction, content recommendation, student needs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review