Cited by 6User Authentication and Security SystemsAdvanced Authentication Protocols SecurityPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

Pico in the Wild: Replacing Passwords, One Site at a Time

Open access
Aebischer, Seb, Dettoni, Claudio, Jenkinson, Graeme, Krol, Kat, Llewellyn-Jones, David, Masui, Toshiyuki, Stajano, Frank·2017·Proceedings 2nd European Workshop on Usable Security

Abstract

Passwords are a burden on the user, especially nowadays with an increasing number of accounts and a proliferation of different devices.Pico is a token-based login method that does not ask users to remember any secrets, nor require keyboard entry of one-time passwords.We wish to evaluate its claim of being simultaneously more usable and more secure than passwords, whilst testing its support for frictionless deployment to web-based services.Our main aim is to collect actionable intelligence on how to improve it.In our study, we teamed up with an Alexa Top 500 website, Gyazo, to offer this alternative login mechanism to users intent on performing a real task of image sharing.We focused on the ecological validity of the trial, and gained knowledge both through the challenges of the trial and the results generated.Users appreciated the ability to avoid password entry but the overall benefit was mitigated by the existing measures put in place by Gyazo to minimise the number of times users are presented with a password entry box.Our main finding is that providing enough benefit requires a solution that applies across sites, rather than focusing on authentication for a single site in isolation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14722/eurousec.2017.23017

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [6]6. F. Stajano, "Pico: No More Passwords!"," in Security Protocols XIX, B. Christianson, B. Crispo, J. Malcolm, and F. Stajano, Eds. Springer International Publishing, 2011, pp. 49-81.
  2. [7]7. R. Morris and K. Thompson, "Password security: A case history," Communications of the ACM, vol. 22, no. 11, 1979.
  3. [8]8. R. Biddle, S. Chiasson, and P. C. van Oorschot, "Graphical passwords: Learning from the first twelve years," ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol. 44, no. 4, p. 19, 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aebischer, S., Dettoni, C., Jenkinson, G., Krol, K., Llewellyn-Jones, D., Masui, T., & Stajano, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Keio University (JP)
Corresponding author
Masui, Toshiyuki
Venue
Proceedings 2nd European Workshop on Usable Security
Published
2017
OpenAlex
W4246663832
Cited by
6
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.42
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
European Symposium on Usable Security (EuroUSEC) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/M019055/1)
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (307224)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
password replacement, one-time password, web authentication, usability, security (computing), image sharing, ecological validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review