The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ROPecker: A Generic and Practical Approach For Defending Against ROP Attacks
Open accessAbstract
Author(s): Yueqiang Cheng, Zongwei Zhou, Miao Yu, Xuhua Ding, Robert H. Deng Download: Paper (PDF) Date: 22 Feb 2014 Document Type: Briefing Papers Additional Documents: Slides Associated Event: NDSS Symposium 2014 Abstract: ROPecker achieves both high detection accuracy and efficiency in ROP defense, without relying on source code, special compiler, or binary rewriting. A sliding … Continued
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Xen and the art of virtualization
Barham, P., Dragovic, B., Fraser, K., Hand, S., Harris, T., Ho, A., Neugebauer, R., Pratt, I., & Warfield, A. (2003) · ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review · doi:10.1145/1165389.945462 · Cited by 5,915
The geometry of innocent flesh on the bone: return-into-libc without function calls (on the x86)
Shacham, H. (2007) · Proceedings of the 14th ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/1315245.1315313 · Cited by 1,280
Newsome, J., & Song, D. X. (2018) · Figshare · doi:10.1184/r1/6468716 · Cited by 1,270
Design and implementation of a TCG-based integrity measurement architecture
Sailer, R., Zhang, X., Jaeger, T., & van Doorn, L. (2004) · USENIX Security Symposium · Cited by 1,035
Abadi, M., Budiu, M., Erlingsson, Ú., & Ligatti, J. (2005) · Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/1102120.1102165 · Cited by 1,032
On the effectiveness of address-space randomization
Shacham, H., Page, M., Pfaff, B., Goh, E.-J., Modadugu, N., & Boneh, D. (2004) · Proceedings of the 11th ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/1030083.1030124 · Cited by 861
Return-oriented programming without returns
Checkoway, S., Davi, L., Dmitrienko, A., Sadeghi, A.-R., Shacham, H., & Winandy, M. (2010) · Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/1866307.1866370 · Cited by 530
Just-In-Time Code Reuse: On the Effectiveness of Fine-Grained Address Space Layout Randomization
Snow, K. Z., Monrose, F., Davi, L., Dmitrienko, A., Liebchen, C., & Sadeghi, A. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/sp.2013.45 · Cited by 505
Practical Control Flow Integrity and Randomization for Binary Executables
Zhang, C., Wei, T., Chen, Z., Duan, L., Szekeres, L., McCamant, S., Song, D., & Zou, W. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/sp.2013.44 · Cited by 482
When good instructions go bad: generalizing return-oriented programming to RISC
Buchanan, E., Roemer, R., Shacham, H., & Savage, S. (2008) · Proceedings of the 15th ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/1455770.1455776 · Cited by 362
Cited by
The Cybersecurity Landscape in Industrial Control Systems
McLaughlin, S., Konstantinou, C., Wang, X., Davi, L., Sadeghi, A.-R., Maniatakos, M., & Karri, R. (2016) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2015.2512235 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheng, Y., Zhou, Z., Yu, M., Ding, X., & Deng, R. H.
- Venue
- Proceedings 2014 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium
- Publisher
- Internet Society
- Published
- 2014
- OpenAlex
- W1968002620
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 26.09
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ROPecker: A Generic and Practical Approach For Defending Against ROP Attacks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14722/ndss.2014.23156
- The paper
- Cheng, Y., Zhou, Z., Yu, M., Ding, X., & Deng, R. H. (2014). ROPecker: A Generic and Practical Approach For Defending Against ROP Attacks. Proceedings 2014 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium. https://doi.org/10.14722/ndss.2014.23156
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
