The DOI matches its Crossref record; 119 of the 121 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
POSEIDON: Privacy-Preserving Federated Neural Network Learning
Open accessAbstract
Furthermore, the trusted party becomes a single point of failure, thus both data and model privacy could be compromised by data breaches, hacking, leaks, etc.Hence, solutions originating from the cryptographic community replace and emulate the trusted party with a group of computing servers.In particular, to enable privacy-preserving training of NNs, several studies employ multiparty computation (MPC) techniques and operate on the two [83], [28], three [82], [110], [111], or four [26], [27] server models.Such approaches, however, limit the number of parties among which the trust is split, often assume an honest majority among the computing servers, and require parties to communicate (i.e., secret share) their data outside their premises.This might not be acceptable due to the privacy and confidentiality requirements and the strict data protection regulations.Furthermore, the computing servers do not operate on their own data or benefit from the model training; hence, their only incentive is the reputation harm if they are caught, which increases the possibility of malicious behavior.A recently proposed alternative for privacy-preserving training of NNs -without data outsourcing -is federated learning.Instead of bringing the data to the model, the model is brought (via a coordinating server) to the clients, who perform model updates on their local data.The updated models from the parties are averaged to obtain the global NN model [75], [63].Although federated learning retains the sensitive input data locally and eliminates the need for data outsourcing, the model, that might also be sensitive, e.g., due to proprietary reasons, becomes available to the coordinating server, thus placing the latter in a position of power with respect to the remaining parties.Recent research demonstrates that sharing intermediate model updates among the parties or with the server might lead to various privacy attacks, such as extracting parties' inputs [53], [113], [120] or membership inference [78], [86].Consequently, several works employ differential privacy to enable privacy-preserving exchanges of intermediate values and to obtain models that are free from adversarial inferences in federated learning settings [67], [101], [76]. Although differentially private techniques partially limit attacks to federated learning, they decrease the utility of the data and the resulting ML model.Furthermore, training robust and accurate models requires high privacy budgets, and as such, the level of privacy achieved in practice remains unclear [55].Therefore, a distributed privacy-preserving deep learning approach requires strong cryptographic protection of the intermediate model updates during the training, as well as of the final model weights.Recent cryptographic approaches for private distributed learning, e.g., [119], [42], not only have limited ML functionalities, i.e., regularized or generalized linear models, but also employ traditional encryption schemes that make them vulnerable to post-quantum attacks.This should be cautiously considered, as recent advances in quantum computing [47], [87], [105], [116], increase the need for deploying quantum-resilient cryptographic schemes that eliminate Abstract-In this paper, we address the problem of privacypreserving training and evaluation of neural networks in an N-party, federated learning setting.We propose a novel system, POSEIDON, the first of its kind in the regime of privacy-preserving neural network training.It employs multiparty lattice-based cryptography to preserve the confidentiality of the training data, the model, and the evaluation data, under a passive-adversary model and collusions between up to N -1 parties.To efficiently execute the secure backpropagation algorithm for training neural networks, we provide a generic packing approach that enables Single Instruction, Multiple Data (SIMD) operations on encrypted data.We also introduce arbitrary linear transformations within the cryptographic bootstrapping operation, optimizing the costly cryptographic computations over the parties, and we define a constrained optimization problem for choosing the cryptographic parameters.Our experimental results show that POSEIDON achieves accuracy similar to centralized or decentralized non-private approaches and that its computation and communication overhead scales linearly with the number of parties.POSEIDON trains a 3-layer neural network on the MNIST dataset with 784 features and 60K samples distributed among 10 parties in less than 2 hours.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Emerging applications include IoT-enabled monitoring platforms, distributed industrial control systems, and privacy-preserving RCA in smart manufacturing and healthcare microservices [240].”
From Anomaly detection and root-cause identification in microservices: a survey (2026) · cites this paper as [240]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning Multiple Layers of Features from Tiny Images
Krizhevsky, A. (2024) · doi:10.57702/zp44cu3g · Cited by 23,889
Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.123 · Cited by 19,741
(2010) · Cited by 14,134
(2016) · Cited by 11,679
(2017) · Cited by 11,625
Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor
Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., Bacon, D., Bardin, J. C., Barends, R., Biswas, R., Boixo, S., Brandao, F. G. S. L., Buell, D. A., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5 · Cited by 7,720
Public-Key Cryptosystems Based on Composite Degree Residuosity Classes
Paillier, P. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-48910-x_16 · Cited by 7,250
Deep Learning with Differential Privacy
Abadi, M., Chu, A., Goodfellow, I., McMahan, H. B., Mironov, I., Talwar, K., & Zhang, L. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/2976749.2978318 · Cited by 6,578
Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Models
Shokri, R., Stronati, M., Song, C., & Shmatikov, V. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2017.41 · Cited by 4,754
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
Jouppi, N. P., Young, C., Patil, N., Patterson, D., Agrawal, G., Bajwa, R., Bates, S., Bhatia, S., Boden, N., Borchers, A., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the 44th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture · doi:10.1145/3079856.3080246 · Cited by 4,537
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- F. Boemer, A. Costache, R. Cammarota, and C. Wierzynski. ngraph-he2: A high-throughput framework for neural network inference on encrypted data. In ACM WAHC, 2019.
- H. Corrigan-Gibbs and D. Boneh. Prio: Private, Robust, and Computation of Aggregate Statistics. In USENIX NSDI, 2017.
- P. Mohassel and P. Rindal. Aby 3: a mixed protocol framework for machine learning. In ACM CCS, 2018.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A robust privacy-preserving federated learning model against model poisoning attacks
Yazdinejad, A., Dehghantanha, A., Karimipour, H., Srivastava, G., & Parizi, R. M. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2024.3420126 · Cited by 380
SAFELearn: Secure Aggregation for private FEderated Learning
Fereidooni, H., Marchal, S., Miettinen, M., Mirhoseini, A., Möllering, H., Nguyen, T. D., Rieger, P., Sadeghi, A., Schneider, T. H., Yalame, H., et al. (2021) · IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW) · doi:10.1109/spw53761.2021.00017 · Cited by 298
Froelicher, D., Troncoso-Pastoriza, J. R., Raisaro, J. L., Cuendet, M. A., Sousa, J. S., Cho, H., Berger, B., Fellay, J., & Hubaux, J. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25972-y · Cited by 226
Self-citationXie, Q., Jiang, S., Jiang, L., Huang, Y., Zhao, Z., Khan, S., Dai, W., Liu, Z., & Wu, K. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3382875 · Cited by 222
Efficient Bootstrapping for Approximate Homomorphic Encryption with Non-sparse Keys
Bossuat, J.-P., Mouchet, C., Troncoso-Pastoriza, J. R., & Hubaux, J. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77870-5_21 · Cited by 181
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sav, S., Pyrgelis, A., Troncoso-Pastoriza, J. R., Froelicher, D., Bossuat, J.-P., Sousa, J. S., & Hubaux, J.-P.
- Affiliations
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proceedings 2021 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium
- Publisher
- Internet Society
- Published
- 2021
- OpenAlex
- W3082434828
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 121
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 12
- FWCI
- 13.17
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
- Keywords
- privacy-preserving federated learning, Poseidon, neural network training, secure multi-party computation, differential privacy, membership inference attacks, data privacy, model privacy, data protection regulation, federated learning security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review