The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Smartphones give you wings: Pedagogical affordances of mobile Web 2.0
Open accessAbstract
Built on the foundation of four years of research and implementation of mobile learning projects (m-learning), this paper provides an overview of the potential of the integration of mobile Web 2.0 tools (based around smartphones) to facilitate social constructivist pedagogies and engage students in tertiary education. Pedagogical affordances of mobile Web 2.0 tools are evaluated, and student usage and feedback is outlined via an interactive multimedia timeline (using YouTube videos) illustrating how these mobile Web 2.0 pedagogical affordances have transformed pedagogy and facilitated student engagement in a variety of course contexts. A rubric for evaluating appropriate smartphone choices is provided, and a model for implementing mobile Web 2.0 pedagogical integration is presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
4 What Is Web 2.0? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software
O’Reilly, T. (2012) · The Social Media Reader · doi:10.18574/nyu/9780814764077.003.0008 · Cited by 5,601
Activity theory for designing mobile learning
Uden, L. (2007) · International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation · doi:10.1504/ijmlo.2007.011190 · Cited by 297
Future Learning Landscapes: Transforming Pedagogy through Social Software
McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2008) · Cited by 231
Luckin, R., Clark, W., Garnett, F., et al. (2010) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-294-7.ch004 · Cited by 129
Cited by
Gikas, J., & Grant, M. M. (2013) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.06.002 · Cited by 1,354
What are the educational affordances of wearable technologies?
Bower, M., & Sturman, D. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.013 · Cited by 267
Chan, N. N., Walker, C., & Gleaves, A. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.001 · Cited by 116
Soomro, K. A., Zai, S. A. Y., Nasrullah, & Hina, Q. A. (2019) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-019-09947-7 · Cited by 29
Liu, X.-X. L. (2021) · Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies · doi:10.24193/jebp.2021.2.9 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Cochrane, T., & Bateman, R.
- Venue
- Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
- Published
- 2010-03-07
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1449-3098 (ISSN-L)
- 1449-5554
- OpenAlex
- W2119008742
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 71.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Smartphones give you wings: Pedagogical affordances of mobile Web 2.0. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14742/ajet.1098
- The paper
- Cochrane, T., & Bateman, R. (2010). Smartphones give you wings: Pedagogical affordances of mobile Web 2.0. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1098
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
