Using the TPACK framework to unite disciplines in online learning
Open accessAbstract
This paper builds on a previous case study in which a group of lecturers from various disciplines were interviewed about their practice as facilitators of online learning. The lecturers' comments about their teaching practices revealed their awareness of specific types of teacher knowledge about online teaching. This was an unintended outcome of the previous study. Subsequently, as reported in this paper, the data were interrogated further using a new lens to investigate the extent to which these elements of teacher knowledge were evident throughout their practices. The technological, pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) theoretical framework enabled the researchers to identify the lecturers' views about the content taught in online and blended environments, the pedagogy which guided teaching and course design, and the technology selected to facilitate students' learning. This paper also considers practical issues about using the TPACK framework as a research tool as a lens through which to view online teachers' knowledge about pedagogy, technology and content.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Providing an integrated approach in relation to the different knowledge domains and the elements involved in online teaching and learning led to impact.
“providing an integrated approach in relation to the different knowledge domains (Anderson, Barham, and Northcote 2013;Evens et al. 2017;Niess and Gillow-Wiles 2014) as well as the elements involved in the online teaching and learning”
From COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices (2020) · cites this paper as Anderson, Barham, and Northcote 2013
Cites
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x · Cited by 12,604 · see citing works
Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., Scharber, C., & Miller, C. (2009) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.41.3.d · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices
Carrillo, C., & Flores, M. A. (2020) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2020.1821184 · Cited by 1,019 · see citing works
Context and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): A Systematic Review
Rosenberg, J. M., & Koehler, M. J. (2015) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2015.1052663 · Cited by 473 · see citing works
TPACK In Situ: A Design-Based Approach Supporting Professional Development in Practice
Pareto, L., & Willermark, S. (2019) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633118783180 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
- Authors
- Anderson, A., Barham, N., & Northcote, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
- Avondale University (AU)
- ORCID
- Northcote, Maria
- Venue
- Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
- Published
- 2013-09-18
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 1449-3098 (ISSN-L)
- 1449-5554
- OpenAlex
- W1815891240
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 12.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Australasian Journal of Educational Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Keywords
- TPACK, teacher knowledge, online learning, blended learning, lecturer teaching practices, course design, pedagogy, educational technology, content knowledge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review