Cited by 43Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesEducation and Technology Integration

TPACK In Situ: A Design-Based Approach Supporting Professional Development in Practice

Pareto, Lena, Willermark, Sara·2019·Journal of Educational Computing Research

Abstract

Technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) is a well-known conceptual framework for what knowledge teachers need in order to teach successfully using technology. Most recent TPACK studies address assessment of teacher TPACK by quantitative self-reporting surveys. Such an approach provides little guidance for teachers in how to develop their everyday teaching practice. We argue for a revival of the original TPACK design-based approach and propose a design-based, operationalization of the framework that is situated in action, context specific, and integrated in practical teaching. The approach has been developed, evaluated, and validated in a school development project in a Nordic Elementary School context using design-based research. The project engaged more than 100 professionals: in-service elementary teachers, school administrators and researchers, and more than 1,000 students during 3 years. The theoretical development evolved from rich descriptions of 38 didactic design as delimited units of teaching including planning, implementation, and evaluation of specified learning tasks acted out in practice. Contributions include framing teaching practice as design activity and a TPACK in situ model and methods targeting reflective practitioners. Our proposed approach addresses current limitations of TPACK and is aligned with advocated professional development methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0735633118783180

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The project resulted in collaborative learning and transformation of work practice.

    “During the project, teachers were challenged in their current teaching practices and the project resulted in collaborative learning and transformation of work practice.”

    From Unpacking the Role of Boundaries in Computer-Supported Collaborative Teaching (2020) · cites this paper as Pareto and Willermark 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pareto, L., & Willermark, S.
Affiliations
University West (SE)
Corresponding author
Willermark, Sara
Venue
Journal of Educational Computing Research
Published
2018-06-29
Volume
57
Issue
5
Pages
1186-1226
ISSN
  • 0735-6331 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-4140
OpenAlex
W2810680138
Cited by
43
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2
FWCI
10.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Computing Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
Keywords
TPACK, technological pedagogical content knowledge, teacher professional development, design-based approach, in situ model, didactic design, reflective practice, primary school teachers, school development, educational technology integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review