Cited by 24Online and Blended LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsInnovative Teaching Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Enhancing the sense of community and learning experience using self-paced instruction and peer tutoring in a computer-laboratory course

Open access
Buraphadeja, Vasa, Kumnuanta, Jirang·2011·Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

Abstract

In its second decade of education reform and its third cycle of national ICT master plans, Thailand struggles to transform its aspirations into practice. This paper chronicles three decades of Thailand's ICT national plans and their relation to education reform. It also discusses the effect of global trends, Asian cultures, and Thai cultures on teaching and learning in higher education. After discussion of existing literature on technology integration in Thailand higher education, this study proposes alternative classroom instructional strategies in a large computer laboratory course, using self-paced learning and peer tutoring. The strategies are grounded in constructivist learning theory which can foster a sense of classroom community, and thereby promote learning. The Classroom Sense of Community Indexwas utilised to measure student perceptions of classroom connectedness, learning, and community in traditional and alternative instructional approaches. Results indicated significant differences in two indices: connectedness and community. Although there was no significant difference in the learning index between the two groups, descriptively the scores were higher for the alternative instructional approaches group. The results imply that the proposed instructional choices have the potential to foster a sense of community and support learning.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14742/ajet.897

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Belland, J. C., Taylor, W. D., Canelos, J., Dwyer, F. & Baker, P. (1985). Is the self-paced instructional program, via microcomputer-based instruction, the most effective method of addressing individual learning differences? Educational Technology Research and Development, 33(3), 185-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02769159 · DOI
  2. Bellon, T. & Oates, R. (2002). Best practices in cyberspace: Motivating the online learner. In the NECC 2002: National Educational Computing Conference Proceedings (pp. 167-181). San Antonio, TX. [viewed 12 Sep 2011]. http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED475923.pdf
  3. Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A. & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243-1289. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654309333844 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Garrison, D. R. & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J. C. & Hall, R. V. (1989). Longitudinal effects of classwide peer tutoring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 371-383. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.371 · DOI
  6. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J. & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  7. Jerome, B. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  8. Kember, D. (2000). Misconceptions about the learning approaches, motivation and study practices of Asian students. Higher Education, 40(1), 99-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1004036826490 · DOI
  9. Kozma, R. B. (2005). National policies that connect ICT-based education reform to economic and social development. Human Technology, 1(2), 117-156.
  10. Krueangniam, P. (2001). A factor analysis that affected the acceptance of innovation and education technology of instructors at Faculty of Education, Rajabhat Institutes, Ministry of Education. Unpublished Masters thesis, King Mongkuts University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand. [viewed 19 Sep 2011] http://www.thaithesis.org/detail.php?id=1496
  11. Laohajaratsang, T. (2009). E-learning readiness in the academic sector of Thailand. In C. J. Bonk, M. M. Lee & T. H. Reynolds (Eds.), A special passage through Asia e-Learning (pp. 109-117). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. http://editlib.org/p/32264
  12. Laohajaratsang, T. (2010b). E-education in Thailand: Equity, quality and sensitivity for learners and teachers. Paper presented at the International Conference Global Learn 2010 on Learning and Technology (Penang, Malaysia, May 17-20, 2010). [viewed 31 Oct 2011]. http://thanompo.edu.cmu.ac.th/load/research/Eeducation.doc.pdf
  13. Menzel, K. E. & Carrell, L. J. (1999). The impact of gender and immediacy of willingness to talk and perceived learning. Communication Education, 48(1), 31-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03634529909379150 · DOI
  14. Miller, J. C. (2009). Computer science innovation in Thailand. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Computer Education Research (pp. 63-74). Berkeley, CA: ACM. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1584322.1584331 · DOI
  15. Ormrod, J. E. (2008). Human learning. Upper Saddle River, New Jersy: Pearson Education.
  16. Pagram, P. & Pagram, J. (2006). Issues in e-learning: A Thai case study. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 26(6), 1-8. http://www.ejisdc.org/ojs2/index.php/ejisdc/article/viewFile/276/175
  17. Powers, S. & Rossman, M. H. (1985). Student satisfaction with graduate education: Dimensionality and assessment in college education. Psychology: A Quarterly Journal of Human Behavior, 22(2), 46-49.
  18. Rovai, A. P. (2002). Development of an instrument to measure classroom community. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(3), 197-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00102-1 · DOI
  19. Siritongthaworn, S., Krairit, D., Dimmitt, N. & Paul, H. (2006). The study of e-learning technology implementation: A preliminary investigation of universities in Thailand. Education and Information Technologies, 11(2), 137-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11134-006- 7363-8 · DOI
  20. Suanpang, P. & Petocz, P. (2006). E-learning in Thailand: An analysis and case study. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(3), 415-438. http://www.editlib.org/p/5708
  21. Thuvasethkul, C. & Koanantakool, T. (2002). National ICT policy in Thailand. Paper presented at the Africa-Asia Workshop (Kuala Lumpur and Penang, Malaysia, March 25-29, 2002). [viewed 12 Aug 2011]. http://www.nectec.or.th/users/htk/publish/20020302-National- ICT-Policy-v16-word.pdf
  22. Topping, K. J. (1996). The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature. Higher Education, 32(3), 321-345. http://www.jstor.org/pss/3448075
  23. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  24. Wittrock, M. C. (1979). The cognitive movement in instruction. Educational Researcher, 8(2), 5-11. http://www.jstor.org/pss/1174411 Authors: Dr Vasa Buraphadeja Martin de Tours School of Management and Economics, Assumption University 88 Moo 8 Bang Na-Trad Km. 26, Bangsaothong, Samutprakarn, Thailand, 10540 Email: vasabrp@au.edu Web: http://www.au.edu/ Jirang Kumnuanta Mae Hong Son College, Chiang Mai Rajabhat University 236 Moo 3 Pangmoo, Mueng, Mae Hong Son, Thailand, 58000 Email: jirangk@gmail.com Web: http://www.cmru.ac.th/ Please cite as: Buraphadeja, V. & Kumnuanta, J. (2011). Enhancing the sense of community and learning experience using self-paced instruction and peer tutoring in a computer-laboratory course. In Hong, K. S. & Lai, K. W. (Eds), ICT for accessible, effective and efficient higher education: Experiences of Southeast Asia. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(Special issue, 8), 1338-1355. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet27/buraphadeja.html

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 24

Metadata

Authors
Buraphadeja, V., & Kumnuanta, J.
Affiliations
  • Assumption University (TH)
  • Chiang Mai Rajabhat University (TH)
Venue
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
Published
2011-12-23
Volume
27
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 1449-3098 (ISSN-L)
  • 1449-5554
OpenAlex
W2123771478
Cited by
24
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
Keywords
sense of community, self-paced learning, peer tutoring, constructivist learning theory, teaching methods, technology integration in higher education, educational reform, Thai culture, learning experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhancing the sense of community and learning experience using self-paced instruction and peer tutoring in a computer-laboratory course. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14742/ajet.897
The paper
Buraphadeja, V., & Kumnuanta, J. (2011). Enhancing the sense of community and learning experience using self-paced instruction and peer tutoring in a computer-laboratory course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.897