The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Querying and mining of time series data: experimental comparison of representations and distance measures
Abstract
The last decade has witnessed a tremendous growths of interests in applications that deal with querying and mining of time series data. Numerous representation methods for dimensionality reduction and similarity measures geared towards time series have been introduced. Each individual work introducing a particular method has made specific claims and, aside from the occasional theoretical justifications, provided quantitative experimental observations. However, for the most part, the comparative aspects of these experiments were too narrowly focused on demonstrating the benefits of the proposed methods over some of the previously introduced ones. In order to provide a comprehensive validation, we conducted an extensive set of time series experiments re-implementing 8 different representation methods and 9 similarity measures and their variants, and testing their effectiveness on 38 time series data sets from a wide variety of application domains. In this paper, we give an overview of these different techniques and present our comparative experimental findings regarding their effectiveness. Our experiments have provided both a unified validation of some of the existing achievements, and in some cases, suggested that certain claims in the literature may be unduly optimistic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection
Kohavi, R. (1995) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.19712698 · Cited by 10,909
Experiencing SAX: A novel symbolic representation of time series
Lin, J., Keogh, E., Wei, L., & Lonardi, S. (2007) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-007-0064-z · Cited by 1,618
Self-citation
Cited by
Time-series clustering – A decade review
Aghabozorgi, S., Seyed Shirkhorshidi, A., & Ying Wah, T. (2015) · Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.is.2015.04.007 · Cited by 1,826
Bagnall, A., Lines, J., Bostrom, A., Large, J., & Keogh, E. (2017) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-016-0483-9 · Cited by 1,377
Self-citationSearching and mining trillions of time series subsequences under dynamic time warping
Rakthanmanon, T., Campana, B., Mueen, A., Batista, G., Westover, B., Zhu, Q., Zakaria, J., & Keogh, E. (2012) · Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2339530.2339576 · Cited by 1,047
Self-citationAn empirical survey of data augmentation for time series classification with neural networks
Iwana, B. K., & Uchida, S. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0254841 · Cited by 725
The BOSS is concerned with time series classification in the presence of noise
Schäfer, P. (2015) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-014-0377-7 · Cited by 560
Metadata
- Authors
- Ding, H., Trajcevski, G., Scheuermann, P., Wang, X., & Keogh, E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1542-1552
- ISSN
- 2150-8097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098759488
- Cited by
- 1,354
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 77.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Querying and mining of time series data: experimental comparison of representations and distance measures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14778/1454159.1454226
- The paper
- Ding, H., Trajcevski, G., Scheuermann, P., Wang, X., & Keogh, E. (2008). Querying and mining of time series data: experimental comparison of representations and distance measures. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment. https://doi.org/10.14778/1454159.1454226
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.