Cited by 285Advanced Database Systems and QueriesDistributed systems and fault toleranceCloud Computing and Resource Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

State management in Apache Flink®: consistent stateful distributed stream processing

Carbone, Paris, Ewen, Stephan, Fóra, Gyula, Haridi, Seif, Richter, Stefan, Tzoumas, Kostas·2017·Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment

Abstract

Stream processors are emerging in industry as an apparatus that drives analytical but also mission critical services handling the core of persistent application logic. Thus, apart from scalability and low-latency, a rising system need is first-class support for application state together with strong consistency guarantees, and adaptivity to cluster reconfigurations, software patches and partial failures. Although prior systems research has addressed some of these specific problems, the practical challenge lies on how such guarantees can be materialized in a transparent, non-intrusive manner that relieves the user from unnecessary constraints. Such needs served as the main design principles of state management in Apache Flink, an open source, scalable stream processor. We present Flink's core pipelined, in-flight mechanism which guarantees the creation of lightweight, consistent, distributed snapshots of application state, progressively, without impacting continuous execution. Consistent snapshots cover all needs for system reconfiguration, fault tolerance and version management through coarse grained rollback recovery. Application state is declared explicitly to the system, allowing efficient partitioning and transparent commits to persistent storage. We further present Flink's backend implementations and mechanisms for high availability, external state queries and output commit. Finally, we demonstrate how these mechanisms behave in practice with metrics and large-deployment insights exhibiting the low performance trade-offs of our approach and the general benefits of exploiting asynchrony in continuous, yet sustainable system deployments.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14778/3137765.3137777

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Spark's Structured Streaming Introduction, 2016, https://www.oreilly.com/learning/apache-spark-2-0--introduction-to-structured-streaming
  2. Rbea, 2016, Scalable Real-Time Analytics at King. https://techblog.king.com/rbea-scalable-real-time-analytics-king/
  3. Apex Apache, 2017, https://apex.apache.org
  4. Beam Apache, 2017, https://beam.apache.org/
  5. Flink Apache, 2017, http://flink.apache.org/
  6. Storm Apache, 2017, http://storm.apache.org/
  7. Forward Flink, 2017, http://flink-forward.org/
  8. Dataflow Google Cloud, 2017, https://cloud.google.com/dataflow/
  9. Kafka, 2017, http://2016.flink-forward.org/kb_sessions/a-brief-history-of-time-with-apache-flink-real-time-monitoring-and-analysis-with-flink-kafka-hb/
  10. 2017, http://rocksdb.org/
  11. Netflix Stream, 2017, http://sf.flink-forward.org/kb_sessions/keynote-stream-processing-with-flink-at-netflix/
  12. Stream Processing Programming Model The Trident, 2017, http://storm.apache.org/releases/0.10.0/Trident-tutorial.html
  13. 10.1007/s00778-003-0095-z · DOI
  14. 10.14778/2536222.2536229 · DOI
  15. 10.14778/2824032.2824076 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1007/s00778-014-0357-y · DOI
  17. Arasu A., 2004, Stream: The stanford data stream management system. Book chapter
  18. 10.1145/1807128.1807148 · DOI
  19. Carbone P., 2015, IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, page, 28
  20. 10.1145/2463676.2465282 · DOI
  21. 10.1145/1809028.1806638 · DOI
  22. 10.1145/872757.872857 · DOI
  23. 10.1145/214451.214456 · DOI
  24. 10.1145/1365815.1365816 · DOI
  25. Cherniack M., 2003, Scalable distributed stream processing. In CIDR, 3, 257
  26. 10.5555/2789272.2789277 · DOI
  27. 10.1145/1327452.1327492 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1145/1323293.1294281 · DOI
  29. 10.1145/568522.568525 · DOI
  30. 10.1145/1807128.1807139 · DOI
  31. Hindman B., 2011, NSDI
  32. Hunt P., 2010, USENIX annual technical conference, 9
  33. 10.14778/3007263.3007272 · DOI
  34. Kreps J., 2011, NetDB
  35. 10.14778/2212351.2212354 · DOI
  36. Marz N., 2015, Big Data: Principles and best practices of scalable realtime data systems
  37. 10.1145/2517349.2522738 · DOI
  38. 10.1145/2523616.2523633 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1109/IPDPS.2012.108 · DOI
  40. Zaharia M., 2010, HotCloud
  41. Zaharia M., 2012, Proceedings of the 4th USENIX conference on Hot Topics in Cloud Ccomputing, 10

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Carbone, P., Ewen, S., Fóra, G., Haridi, S., Richter, S., & Tzoumas, K.
Affiliations
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
  • data Artisans
  • King Digital Entertainment Limited
Venue
Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
Published
2017-08
Volume
10
Issue
12
Pages
1718-1729
ISSN
2150-8097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2752238980
Cited by
285
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 1
FWCI
30.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Advanced Database Systems and Queries
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed systems and fault tolerance
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
Keywords
Apache Flink, state management, stream processing, distributed snapshots, fault tolerance, high availability, checkpointing, pipelined execution, state partitioning, cluster reconfiguration, version control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review