Cited by 90Cloud Computing and Resource ManagementSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GPeer-to-Peer Network Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

From cloud computing to sky computing

Open access
Stoica, Ion, Shenker, Scott·2021·Proceedings of the Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems

Abstract

We consider the future of cloud computing and ask how we might guide it towards a more coherent service we call sky computing. The barriers are more economic than technical, and we propose reciprocal peering as a key enabling step.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3458336.3465301

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SkyPilot [19] and Sky Computing [18] address stateless workloads and do not handle KV state.

    “SkyPilot [19] and Sky Computing [18] address stateless workloads and do not handle KV state.”

    From Janus: Joint Prefill/Decode Disaggregation with KV-Cache-Aware Multi-Cloud Routing for Edge-Adjacent LLM Serving (2026) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Compatibility Layer section (page unavailable) includes databases such as Cassandra and Redis in its proposed software stack and discusses a storage API for reading data across clouds. Peering Between Clouds (page unavailable) also considers data updated by computation. The paper therefore does not restrict Sky computing to stateless workloads, though it does not specify support for KV state in particular. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Spot-arbitrage work [18, 19] targets stateless or checkpoint-restart jobs; Janus's state-aware arbitrage, using transport policy to make the cache itself a routing decision, is to our knowledge novel.

    “Spot-arbitrage work [18, 19] targets stateless or checkpoint-restart jobs; Janus 's state-aware arbitrage, using transport policy to make the cache itself a routing decision, is to our knowledge novel.”

    From Janus: Joint Prefill/Decode Disaggregation with KV-Cache-Aware Multi-Cloud Routing for Edge-Adjacent LLM Serving (2026) · cites this paper as [18]

    The cited paper's sections 5 (Intercloud Layer) and 6 (Peering Between Clouds) discuss job placement and the costs of moving data between clouds. A search for spot-arbitrage, stateless jobs, and checkpoint-restart jobs found no passage addressing the claim attributed to this source. The statement about Janus's novelty is the citing authors' own assessment. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Tianqi Chen , Mu Li , Yutian Li , Min Lin , Naiyan Wang , Minjie Wang , Tianjun Xiao , Bing Xu , Chiyuan Zhang , and Zheng Zhang . MXNet : A flexible and efficient machine learning library for heterogeneous distributed systems . In NIPS Workshop on Machine Learning Systems (LearningSys'16) , 2016 . Tianqi Chen, Mu Li, Yutian Li, Min Lin, Naiyan Wang, Minjie Wang, Tianjun Xiao, Bing Xu, Chiyuan Zhang, and Zheng Zhang. MXNet: A flexible and efficient machine learning library for heterogeneous distributed systems. In NIPS Workshop on Machine Learning Systems (LearningSys'16), 2016.
  2. 10.5555/3291168.3291210 · DOI
  3. Alexander Sergeev and Mike Del Balso . Horovod: fast and easy distributed deep learning in tensorflow. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.05799 , 2018 . Alexander Sergeev and Mike Del Balso. Horovod: fast and easy distributed deep learning in tensorflow. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.05799, 2018. · arXiv
  4. 10.5555/2285539 · DOI
  5. 10.5555/2228298.2228301 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Stoica, I., & Shenker, S.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2021-06
Pages
26-32
OpenAlex
W3168937343
Cited by
89
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 3
FWCI
12.23
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies
Keywords
cloud computing, economic barriers, internet infrastructure, network interconnection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review