Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 6

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The future of physiological research: A greater understanding of female master athletes and aging?

Daly, Lorcan S.·2024·Physiological Reports

Abstract

High caliber master athletes provide a valuable model for studying inherent physiological aging and performance capacity, without the confounding factor of physical inactivity. Despite the remarkable achievements of female master athletes, their participation rates remain significantly lower than those of their male counterparts, particularly at more advanced ages. This review examines the biological sex gap in sports participation among master athletes and the subsequent disparity in empirical research, thereafter exploring possible contributing factors. It highlights the importance of studying female master athletes to better understand the aging process and offers recommendations to address current evidence gaps. The need for more comprehensive mechanistic data on highly trained older women, novel cataloguing and analysis of real‐world datasets, case studies/series, and longitudinal research are also emphasized. Although analyzing the records of female master athletes as a surrogate to determine age‐related physiological and performance changes is a common approach, the process may be hindered by the considerably lower participation rates of women. Therefore, an important step toward bridging these gaps is the longitudinal, integrative study of female athletes engaged in lifelong exercise. Such analyses would improve our understanding of senescence in women and may inform interventions targeting the promotion of physical function in older adults.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14814/phy2.70109

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. 10.1093/gerona/glaa292 · DOI
  2. 10.1123/ijspp.2018‐0879 · DOI
  3. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00698.2023 · DOI
  4. DeFrantz A., 1997, The changing role of women in the Olympic games, Olympic Review, 26, 18
  5. 10.1123/ijsnem.2023‐0230 · DOI
  6. 10.3389/fphys.2021.730995 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s11357‐020‐00275‐0 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s11357‐021‐00411‐4 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/gerona/glab049 · DOI
  10. 10.1055/a‐2003‐9406 · DOI
  11. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00866.2023 · DOI
  12. 10.1249/mss.0b013e31826900f6 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/cphy.c220027 · DOI
  14. 10.1123/ijsnem.2023‐0087 · DOI
  15. 10.1136/bjsports‐2020‐103173 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1183/13993003.00347‐2016 · DOI
  17. 10.1113/jp282896 · DOI
  18. 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.141879 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Daly, L. S.
Affiliations
Department of Sport and Health Sciences Technological University of the Shannon Athlone Ireland
Venue
Physiological Reports
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-10-31
Volume
12
Issue
21
ISSN
2051-817X
Cited by
6
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.