The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The future of physiological research: A greater understanding of female master athletes and aging?
Abstract
High caliber master athletes provide a valuable model for studying inherent physiological aging and performance capacity, without the confounding factor of physical inactivity. Despite the remarkable achievements of female master athletes, their participation rates remain significantly lower than those of their male counterparts, particularly at more advanced ages. This review examines the biological sex gap in sports participation among master athletes and the subsequent disparity in empirical research, thereafter exploring possible contributing factors. It highlights the importance of studying female master athletes to better understand the aging process and offers recommendations to address current evidence gaps. The need for more comprehensive mechanistic data on highly trained older women, novel cataloguing and analysis of real‐world datasets, case studies/series, and longitudinal research are also emphasized. Although analyzing the records of female master athletes as a surrogate to determine age‐related physiological and performance changes is a common approach, the process may be hindered by the considerably lower participation rates of women. Therefore, an important step toward bridging these gaps is the longitudinal, integrative study of female athletes engaged in lifelong exercise. Such analyses would improve our understanding of senescence in women and may inform interventions targeting the promotion of physical function in older adults.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While many studies have explored age-related declines in endurance performance, comparatively few reviews [3,19] or meta-analyses [20] have summarized these effects in women masters athletes.”
From Effects of Aging on Determinants of Endurance Performance in Women Masters Athletes: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as [19]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Declining performance of master athletes: silhouettes of the trajectory of healthy human ageing?
Lazarus, N. R., & Harridge, S. D. R. (2017) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jp272443 · Cited by 116
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- 10.1093/gerona/glaa292 · DOI
- 10.1123/ijspp.2018‐0879 · DOI
- 10.1152/japplphysiol.00698.2023 · DOI
- DeFrantz A., 1997, The changing role of women in the Olympic games, Olympic Review, 26, 18
- 10.1123/ijsnem.2023‐0230 · DOI
- 10.3389/fphys.2021.730995 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11357‐020‐00275‐0 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11357‐021‐00411‐4 · DOI
- 10.1093/gerona/glab049 · DOI
- 10.1055/a‐2003‐9406 · DOI
- 10.1152/japplphysiol.00866.2023 · DOI
- 10.1249/mss.0b013e31826900f6 · DOI
- 10.1002/cphy.c220027 · DOI
- 10.1123/ijsnem.2023‐0087 · DOI
- 10.1136/bjsports‐2020‐103173 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1183/13993003.00347‐2016 · DOI
- 10.1113/jp282896 · DOI
- 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.141879 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Vangsgaard, D., Noumi, M., Hayden, K. A., & Doyle-Baker, P. K. (2026) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare14081080
Metadata
- Authors
- Daly, L. S.
- Affiliations
- Department of Sport and Health Sciences Technological University of the Shannon Athlone Ireland
- ORCID
- Daly, Lorcan S.
- Venue
- Physiological Reports
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2024-10-31
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 21
- ISSN
- 2051-817X
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.