Cited by 0Biblical Studies and InterpretationReligion, Theology, History, Judaism, ChristianityHistorical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies

Planting Salvation and Raining Resurrection in Ancient Judaism

Grenier, Marc·2023·Liber Annuus

Abstract

This essay questions contemporary claims in biblical scholarship that ideas about resurrection were not fully expressed in the early Hebrew Bible until the late post-Exilic era, implying that such ideas were either culturally irrelevant or inexistent prior to that point. This position posits that only later did the pre-Exilic notions of a dark and gloomy Sheol come to take on post-Exilic ideas such as immortality, retribution after death, and bodily resurrection mostly if not entirely due to the effect of ‘foreign’ influences upon Jewish thinking, such as Greek and Persian views. The argument here is that this dichotomized understanding of the historical development of ancient Judaic views about the afterlife widely accepted in biblical scholarly circles today is grossly over-generalized and exaggerated. This essay shows that ideas about resurrection had been vibrant and well-established all along many centuries before Daniel in ancient popular Jewish culture largely in the form of agrarian metaphors and imageries, making it possible for beliefs about bodily resurrection in Christ to be seriously considered by 1st-century Jews. Such ideas were deeply reflected in Jewish prayer books, liturgy, and rituals, and in descriptions of natural processes such as raining, planting, and harvesting. The veracity of this position is demonstrated through a detailed review of death and resurrection ideas before Daniel and beyond, in the Songs of Moses and Hannah, the Elijah and Elisha narratives, the Book of Psalms, the prophecies of Hosea, Ezekiel’s vivid resurrection imageries, and Isaiah’s apocalypse, to name just a few.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1484/j.la.5.141398

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Grenier, M.
Corresponding author
Grenier, Marc
Venue
Liber Annuus
Published
2023-01
Volume
73
Pages
105-125
ISSN
  • 0081-8933 (ISSN-L)
  • 2507-0428
OpenAlex
W4394943054
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Liber Annuus (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
Keywords
resurrection, Sheol, afterlife beliefs, ancient Judaism, Hebrew Bible, Psalms, Hosea, Ezekiel, Isaiah, immortality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review