The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Die Schulzugehörigkeit von Maitreyasamitināṭaka und Maitrisimit
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The fact that Tocharian literature contains elements that make a successful classification according to the Buddhist school difficult, be it Sarv ā stiv ā da vs. M ū lasarv ā stiv ā da, or H ī nay ā na vs. Mah ā y ā na, has long been observed.”
From The Sanskrit Udānavarga and the Tocharian B Udānastotra: a window on the relationship between religious and popular language on the northern Silk Road (2016) · cites this paper as Hartmann 2013
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Peyrot, M. (2016) · Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies · doi:10.1017/s0041977x16000057 · Cited by 5
Recherches sur les textes de méditation en tokharien
Huard, A. (2022) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/9b9e92f8z8023z4704zbf6bz7228de8d26e7 · Cited by 4
Maitrisimit'in 19. Bölümü Üzerine Bazı Yeni Tespitler
Yüsüp, A. (2025) · International Journal of Old Uyghur Studies · doi:10.46614/ijous.1848134
Ito, Y. (2026) · International Journal of Asian Studies · doi:10.1017/s1479591425100193
Metadata
- Authors
- Hartmann, J.-U.
- Corresponding author
- Hartmann, Jens-Uwe
- Venue
- Silk Road Studies
- Publisher
- Brepols Publishers
- Published
- 2013-01
- Pages
- 37-50
- ISSN
- 1782-6225 (ISSN-L)
- 2566-008X
- OpenAlex
- W1845935357
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 8.23
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Silk Road studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Eurasian Exchange Networks
- Keywords
- school affiliation, Buddhist drama, Sanskrit drama
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Die Schulzugehörigkeit von Maitreyasamitināṭaka und Maitrisimit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1484/m.srs-eb.4.00288
- The paper
- Hartmann, J.-U. (2013). Die Schulzugehörigkeit von Maitreyasamitināṭaka und Maitrisimit. Silk Road Studies. https://doi.org/10.1484/m.srs-eb.4.00288
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
