The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inequalities in access to medical care by income in developed countries
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Most of the member countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) aim to ensure equitable access to health care. This is often interpreted as requiring that care be available on the basis of need and not willingness or ability to pay. We sought to examine equity in physician utilization in 21 OECD countries for the year 2000. METHODS: Using data from national surveys or from the European Community Household Panel, we extracted the number of visits to a general practitioner or medical specialist over the previous 12 months. Visits were standardized for need differences using age, sex and reported health levels as proxies. We measured inequity in doctor utilization by income using concentration indices of the need-standardized use. RESULTS: We found inequity in physician utilization favouring patients who are better off in about half of the OECD countries studied. The degree of pro-rich inequity in doctor use is highest in the United States and Mexico, followed by Finland, Portugal and Sweden. In most countries, we found no evidence of inequity in the distribution of general practitioner visits across income groups, and where it does occur, it often indicates a pro-poor distribution. However, in all countries for which data are available, after controlling for need differences, people with higher incomes are significantly more likely to see a specialist than people with lower incomes and, in most countries, also more frequently. Pro-rich inequity is especially large in Portugal, Finland and Ireland. INTERPRETATION: Although in most OECD countries general practitioner care is distributed fairly equally and is often even pro-poor, the very pro-rich distribution of specialist care tends to make total doctor utilization somewhat pro-rich. This phenomenon appears to be universal, but it is reinforced when private insurance or private care options are offered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Income-Related Inequality in the Use of Medical Care in 21 OECD Countries
(2004) · OECD Health Working Papers · doi:10.1787/687501760705 · Cited by 630
Self-citation
Cited by
The Brazilian health system: history, advances, and challenges
Paim, J., Travassos, C., Almeida, C., Bahia, L., & Macinko, J. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60054-8 · Cited by 2,426
Orrow, G., Kinmonth, A.-L., Sanderson, S., & Sutton, S. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e1389 · Cited by 739
Conindex: Estimation of Concentration Indices
O'Donnell, O., O'Neill, S., Van Ourti, T., & Walsh, B. (2016) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x1601600112 · Cited by 491
Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data
O’Donnell, O., van Doorslaer, E. K. A., Wagstaff, W., & Lindelöw, M. (2008) · University Libraries (University of Maryland) · doi:10.13016/fcm7-vvv1 · Cited by 290
Marrone, S. (2007) · International Journal of Circumpolar Health · doi:10.3402/ijch.v66i3.18254 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- van Doorslaer, E.
- Venue
- Canadian Medical Association Journal
- Publisher
- CMA Joule Inc.
- Published
- 2006-01-17
- Volume
- 174
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 177-183
- ISSN
- 0820-3946 (ISSN-L)
- 1488-2329
- OpenAlex
- W2129490367
- Cited by
- 952
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 83.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inequalities in access to medical care by income in developed countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1503/cmaj.050584
- The paper
- van Doorslaer, E. (2006). Inequalities in access to medical care by income in developed countries. Canadian Medical Association Journal. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.050584
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.