Income-Related Inequality in the Use of Medical Care in 21 OECD Countries
Abstract
This study updates and extends a previous study on equity in physician utilisation for a subset of the countries analyzed here (Van Doorslaer, Koolman and Puffer, 2002). It updates results to 2000 for 13 countries and adds new results for eight countries: Australia, Finland, France, Hungary, Mexico, Norway, Switzerland and Sweden. Both simple quintile distributions and concentration indices were used to assess horizontal equity, i.e. the extent to which adults in equal need for physician care appear to have equal rates of medical care utilisation. With respect to physician utilisation, need is more concentrated among the worse off, but after “standardizing out” these need differences, significant horizontal inequity favoring the better off is found in about half of the countries, both for the probability and the total number of visits. The degree of pro-rich inequity in doctor use is highest in the US, followed by Mexico, Finland, Portugal and Sweden. In the majority ... Cette etude actualise et etend le champ d'investigation d'une etude anterieure sur l'equite de l'utilisation des services des medecins effectuee pour un sous-ensemble de pays analyses ici (Van Doorslaer, Koolman et Puffer, 2002). Elle actualise les resultats jusqu’a l’annee 2000 pour treize pays et incorpore de nouveaux resultats pour huit autres pays de l'OCDE : l’Australie, la Finlande, la France, la Hongrie, le Mexique, la Norvege, la Suisse et la Suede. Elle utilise a la fois les distributions par quintil…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some evidence indicates cross-national differences in how SES relates to mental disorder treatment.
“there is some evidence of cross-national differences in the association of SES with mental disorder treatment (Kessler et al. 1997; Van Doorslaer & Masseria, 2004; Devaux & De Looper, 2012).”
From Socio-economic variations in the mental health treatment gap for people with anxiety, mood, and substance use disorders: Results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) surveys (2018) · cites this paper as Van Doorslaer & Masseria, 2004
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 30 · Cited by 630
- Authors
- van Doorslaer, E. K. A., & Masseria, C.
- Venue
- OECD Health Working Papers
- Published
- 2004-05-11
- ISSN
- 1815-2015 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2171738165
- Cited by
- 630
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 138 · 2012: 25
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- OECD health working papers (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Keywords
- health care utilization, physician visits, horizontal equity, income inequality, concentration index, health care access, OECD countries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review