Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 218

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Angioedema without urticaria: a large clinical survey

Open access
Zingale, L. C., Beltrami, L., Zanichelli, A., Maggioni, L., Pappalardo, E., Cicardi, B., Cicardi, M.·2006·Canadian Medical Association Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Angioedema without major urticarial flares (hives) is poorly understood. Its causes are diverse, and little is known about its pathogenic mechanisms. We report on our 11 years of experience with this condition and propose a classification of patients affected by angioedema unaccompanied by urticaria. METHODS: From 1993 through 2003 at our outpatient clinic, 929 consecutive patients were examined for recurrent angioedema unaccompanied by urticaria. A detailed history was taken to identify known causes of angioedema, with special attention to external allergenic agents. Each patient underwent a complete physical examination, routine laboratory tests (blood cell count, protein electrophoresis, erythrosedimentation rate, examination of stool for ova and parasites, pharyngeal and urine cultures, sinus and dental radiography, and measurements of antitissue autoantibodies and rheumatoid factor in plasma), and complement parameters (C1 inhibitor, C4 and C1q). Further testing was done when pertinent, based on clinical findings. When all results were negative, response to H1-antihistamine was considered. RESULTS: Angioedema could not be classified in 153 patients who were lost to follow-up (16.4%). Among the 776 cases with adequate data, these types of angioedema were identified: 124 (16%) related to external agents such as a drug, insect bite or foodstuff; 85 (11%) related to treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; 55 (7%) associated with an autoimmune disease or infection; and 197 (25%) caused by C1 inhibitor deficiency. In the other 315 cases (41%), the etiology was undiscovered: 254 cases (33% of the study sample) were idiopathic histaminergic; 40 (5%) were idiopathic nonhistaminergic; and 21 (3%) had other causes of peripheral or generalyzed edema. INTERPRETATION: Our data indicated that angioedema without urticaria could be classified according to specific clinical and pathogenic characteristics, and we have suggested a work-up for patients experiencing this condition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1503/cmaj.060535

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 218

Metadata

Authors
Zingale, L. C., Beltrami, L., Zanichelli, A., Maggioni, L., Pappalardo, E., Cicardi, B., & Cicardi, M.
Venue
Canadian Medical Association Journal
Published
2006-10-24
Volume
175
Issue
9
Pages
1065-1070
ISSN
  • 0820-3946 (ISSN-L)
  • 1488-2329
OpenAlex
W2162647242
Cited by
218
References
5
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Angioedema without urticaria: a large clinical survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1503/cmaj.060535
The paper
Zingale, L. C., Beltrami, L., Zanichelli, A., Maggioni, L., Pappalardo, E., Cicardi, B., & Cicardi, M. (2006). Angioedema without urticaria: a large clinical survey. Canadian Medical Association Journal. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.060535

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.