The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Maternal age and risk of stillbirth: a systematic review
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The number of women who delay childbirth to their late 30s and beyond has increased significantly over the past several decades. Studies regarding the relation between older maternal age and the risk of stillbirth have yielded inconsistent conclusions. In this systematic review we explored whether older maternal age is associated with an increased risk of stillbirth. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for all relevant articles (original studies and systematic reviews) published up to Dec. 31, 2006. We included all cohort and case-control studies that measured the association between maternal age and risk of stillbirth. Two reviewers independently abstracted data from all included studies using a standardized data abstraction form. Methodologic and statistical heterogeneities were reviewed and tested. RESULTS: We identified 913 unique citations, of which 31 retrospective cohort and 6 case-control studies met our inclusion criteria. In 24 (77%) of the 31 cohort studies and all 6 of the case-control studies, we found that greater maternal age was significantly associated with an increased risk of stillbirth; relative risks varied from 1.20 to 4.53 for older versus younger women. In the 14 studies that presented adjusted relative risk, we found no extensive change in the direction or magnitude of the relative risk after adjustment. We did not calculate a pooled relative risk because of the extreme methodologic heterogeneity among the individual studies. INTERPRETATION: Women with advanced maternal age have an increased risk of stillbirth. However, the magnitude and mechanisms of the increased risk are not clear, and prospective studies are warranted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
(2014) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 17,633
Practical Statistics for Medical Research
Altman, D. G. (1990) · doi:10.1201/9780429258589 · Cited by 10,668
Practical Statistics for Medical Research.
Bartko, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (1992) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290246 · Cited by 4,797
International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems
(2011) · Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_3055 · Cited by 4,151
Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study
Andersen, A.-M. N. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7251.1708 · Cited by 1,690
Impact of Maternal Age on Obstetric Outcome
Cleary-Goldman, J., Malone, F. D., Vidaver, J., Ball, R. H., Nyberg, D. A., Comstock, C. H., Saade, G. R., Eddleman, K. A., Klugman, S., Dugoff, L., et al. (2005) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000158118.75532.51 · Cited by 867
Advanced Maternal Age and Adverse Perinatal Outcome
Jacobsson, B., Ladfors, L., & Milsom, I. (2004) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000140682.63746.be · Cited by 704
Advanced Maternal Age — How Old Is Too Old?
Heffner, L. J. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp048087 · Cited by 560
Epidemiology of preeclampsia and eclampsia in the United States, 1979-1986
Saftlas, A. F., Olson, D. R., Franks, A. L., Atrash, H. K., & Pokras, R. (1990) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(90)91176-d · Cited by 505
Cited by
Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Lean, S. C., Derricott, H., Jones, R. L., & Heazell, A. E. P. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186287 · Cited by 737
Maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: a cohort study
Khalil, A., Syngelaki, A., Maiz, N., Zinevich, Y., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2013) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.12494 · Cited by 439
Indications for and Risks of Elective Cesarean Section
Mylonas, I., & Friese, K. (2015) · Deutsches Ärzteblatt international · doi:10.3238/arztebl.2015.0489 · Cited by 359
Maternal age and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective cohort study
Londero, A. P., Rossetti, E., Pittini, C., Cagnacci, A., & Driul, L. (2019) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-019-2400-x · Cited by 285
Delayed childbearing: effects on fertility and the outcome of pregnancy
Balasch, J., & Gratacós, E. (2012) · Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/gco.0b013e3283517908 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, L., Sauve, R., Birkett, N., Fergusson, D., & van Walraven, C.
- Venue
- Canadian Medical Association Journal
- Publisher
- CMA Joule Inc.
- Published
- 2008-01-15
- Volume
- 178
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 165-172
- ISSN
- 0820-3946 (ISSN-L)
- 1488-2329
- OpenAlex
- W2121305922
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 2.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maternal age and risk of stillbirth: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1503/cmaj.070150
- The paper
- Huang, L., Sauve, R., Birkett, N., Fergusson, D., & van Walraven, C. (2008). Maternal age and risk of stillbirth: a systematic review. Canadian Medical Association Journal. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.070150
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.