Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Changes in the rates of awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in Canada over the past two decades

Open access
McAlister, Finlay A., Wilkins, Kathryn, Joffres, Michel, Leenen, Frans H.H., Fodor, George, Gee, Marianne, Tremblay, Mark S., Walker, Robin, Johansen, Helen, Campbell, Norm·2011·Canadian Medical Association Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Analyses of medication databases indicate marked increases in prescribing of antihypertensive drugs in Canada over the past decade. This study was done to examine the trends in the prevalence of hypertension and in control rates in Canada between 1992 and 2009. METHODS: Three population-based surveys, the 1986-1992 Canadian Heart Health Surveys, the 2006 Ontario Survey on the Prevalence and Control of Hypertension and the 2007-2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey, collected self-reported health information from, and measured blood pressure among, community-dwelling adults. RESULTS: The population prevalence of hypertension was stable between 1992 and 2009 at 19.7%-21.6%. Hypertension control improved from 13.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.7%-15.7%) in 1992 to 64.6% (95% CI 60.0%-69.2%) in 2009, reflecting improvements in awareness (from 56.9% [95% CI 53.1%-60.5%] in 1992 to 82.5% [95% CI 78.5%-86.0%] in 2009) and treatment (from 34.6% [95% CI 29.2%-40.0%] in 1992 to 79.0% [95% CI 71.3%-86.7%] in 2009) among people with hypertension. The size of improvements in awareness, treatment and control were similar among people who had or did not have cardiovascular comorbidities Although systolic blood pressures among patients with untreated hypertension were similar between 1992 and 2009 (ranging from 146 [95% CI 145-147] mm Hg to 148 [95% CI 144-151] mm Hg), people who did not have hypertension and patients with hypertension that was being treated showed substantially lower systolic pressures in 2009 than in 1992 (113 [95% CI 112-114] v. 117 [95% CI 117-117] mm Hg and 128 [95% CI 126-130] v. 145 [95% CI 143-147] mm Hg). INTERPRETATION: The prevalence of hypertension has remained stable among community-dwelling adults in Canada over the past two decades, but the rates for treatment and control of hypertension have improved markedly during this time.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1503/cmaj.101767

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
McAlister, F. A., Wilkins, K., Joffres, M., Leenen, F. H. H., Fodor, G., Gee, M., Tremblay, M. S., Walker, R., Johansen, H., & Campbell, N.
Venue
Canadian Medical Association Journal
Published
2011-05-16
Volume
183
Issue
9
Pages
1007-1013
ISSN
  • 0820-3946 (ISSN-L)
  • 1488-2329
OpenAlex
W2165962672
Cited by
265
References
36
FWCI
21.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changes in the rates of awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in Canada over the past two decades. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1503/cmaj.101767
The paper
McAlister, F. A., Wilkins, K., Joffres, M., Leenen, F. H. H., Fodor, G., Gee, M., Tremblay, M. S., Walker, R., Johansen, H., & Campbell, N. (2011). Changes in the rates of awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in Canada over the past two decades. Canadian Medical Association Journal. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.101767

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.