Cited by 464Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesSodium Intake and HealthHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

Hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment and control in national surveys from England, the USA and Canada, and correlation with stroke and ischaemic heart disease mortality: a cross-sectional study

Open access
Joffres, Michel, Falaschetti, Emanuela, Gillespie, Cathleen, Robitaille, Cynthia, Loustalot, Fleetwood, Poulter, Neil, McAlister, Finlay A, Johansen, Helen +2 more·2013·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objective: Comparison of recent national survey data on prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in England, the USA and Canada, and correlation of these parameters with each country stroke and ischaemic heart disease (IHD) mortality. Design: Non-institutionalised population surveys. Setting and participants: England (2006 n=6873), the USA (2007–2010 n=10 003) and Canada (2007–2009 n=3485) aged 20–79 years. Outcomes: Stroke and IHD mortality rates were plotted against countries’ specific prevalence data. Results: Mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) was higher in England than in the USA and Canada in all age–gender groups. Mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was similar in the three countries before age 50 and then fell more rapidly in the USA, being the lowest in the USA. Only 34% had a BP under 140/90 mm Hg in England, compared with 50% in the USA and 66% in Canada. Prehypertension and stages 1 and 2 hypertension prevalence figures were the highest in England. Hypertension prevalence (≥140 mm Hg SBP and/or ≥90 mm Hg DBP) was lower in Canada (19·5%) than in the USA (29%) and England (30%). Hypertension awareness was higher in the USA (81%) and Canada (83%) than in England (65%). England also had lower levels of hypertension treatment (51%; USA 74%; Canada 80%) and control (<140/90 mm Hg; 27%; the USA 53%; Canada 66%). Canada had the lowest stroke and IHD mortality rates, England the highest and the rates were inversely related to the mean SBP in each country and strongly related to the blood pressure indicators, the strongest relationship being between low hypertension awareness and stroke mortality. Conclusions: While the current prevention efforts in England should result in future-improved figures, especially at younger ages, these data still show important gaps in the management of hypertension in these countries, with consequences on stroke and IHD mortality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003423

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [19]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Vital signs: awareness and treatment of uncontrolled hypertension among adults—United States, 2003–2010 Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2012; 61: 703– 9
  2. [29]Institute of Medicine A population-based policy and systems change approach to prevent and control hypertension. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 2010 25032370

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joffres, M., Falaschetti, E., Gillespie, C., Robitaille, C., Loustalot, F., Poulter, N., McAlister, F. A., Johansen, H., Baclic, O., & Campbell, N.
Affiliations
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Public Health Agency of Canada (CA)
  • Alberta Hospital Edmonton (CA)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Joffres, Michel
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-08
Volume
3
Issue
8
Pages
e003423
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2118417136
Cited by
464
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 5
FWCI
30.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
  • Public Health Agency of Canada
  • University of Alberta
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0510-10055, NF-SI-0510-10186)
  • Public Health Agency
  • Alberta Innovates
  • Servier
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Health Canada
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
hypertension prevalence, hypertension awareness, antihypertensive therapy, blood pressure control, stroke mortality, ischemic heart disease mortality, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, prehypertension, cross-national comparison, England, United States, Canada

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review