The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Powder-based additive manufacturing-a review of types of defects, generation mechanisms, detection, property evaluation and metrology
Abstract
Powder-based additive manufacturing (AM) technologies have been evaluated for use in different fields of application (aerospace, medical, etc.). Ideally, AM parts should be at least equivalent, or preferably better quality than conventionally produced parts. Manufacturing defects and their effects on the quality and performance of AM parts are a currently a major concern. It is essential to understand the defect types, their generation mechanisms, and the detection methodologies for mechanical properties evaluation and quality control. We consider the various types of microstructural features or defects, their generation mechanisms, their effect on bulk properties and the capability of existing characterisation methodologies for powder based AM parts in this work. Methods of in-situ non-destructive evaluation and the influence of defects on mechanical properties and design considerations are also reviewed. Together, these provide a framework to understand the relevant machine and material parameters, optimise the process and production, and select appropriate characterisation methods.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Powder-based processes are prone to issues of porosity, lackof-fusion, balling, and cracks [428,430,431], while geometry deviation, shape shrinkage, surface imperfections, layer misalignment, and adhesion issues [432-435] are the main concerns in the FFF processes.”
From A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction (2024) · cites this paper as [431]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mahmood, M. A., Chioibasu, D., Ur Rehman, A., Mihai, S., & Popescu, A. C. (2022) · Metals · doi:10.3390/met12010077 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Taheri, H., Shoaib, M. R. B. M., Koester, L. W., Bigelow, T. A., Collins, P. C., & Bond, L. J.
- Affiliations
- Iowa State University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Journal of Additive and Subtractive Materials Manufacturing
- Publisher
- Inderscience Publishers
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 172
- ISSN
- 2057-4975 (ISSN-L)
- 2057-4983
- OpenAlex
- W2768427822
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 8.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Additive and Subtractive Materials Manufacturing (publishedVersion)
- Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Powder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials
- Keywords
- powder-based additive manufacturing, manufacturing defects, defect formation mechanism, defect detection, non-destructive testing, mechanical properties, microstructure, quality control, metrology, in situ characterization, process parameters, design considerations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Powder-based additive manufacturing-a review of types of defects, generation mechanisms, detection, property evaluation and metrology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1504/ijasmm.2017.088204
- The paper
- Taheri, H., Shoaib, M. R. B. M., Koester, L. W., Bigelow, T. A., Collins, P. C., & Bond, L. J. (2017). Powder-based additive manufacturing-a review of types of defects, generation mechanisms, detection, property evaluation and metrology. International Journal of Additive and Subtractive Materials Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijasmm.2017.088204