Cited by 33Teaching and Learning ProgrammingEducation and Learning InterventionsEducational Technology and E-Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Identifying potential design features of a smart learning environment for programming education in Nigeria

Open access
Agbo, Friday Joseph, Oyelere, Solomon Sunday, Suhonen, Jarkko, Tukiainen, Markku·2019·International Journal of Learning Technology

Abstract

Smart learning environment (SLE) has been researched to enhance teaching and learning by providing personalised learning, quick feedback, motivation and learning support. This study discusses the features of SLE that are relevant to programming education and the general design features for developing SLEs. In addition, the study provides insights into the level of awareness and use of the SLE for programming education in the Nigerian higher education institutions (HEIs). In this study, mixed research method was employed to conduct a survey among the teachers and students of computer science at HEI in Nigeria. Data were collected through questionnaire and interview instruments. The study showed that the students and teachers have no experience of SLEs but indicate strong willingness to embrace the use of the SLE for programming education. Besides, tentative features of SLE such as learning guides, personalised learning, quick feedback mechanisms, and automatic task scheduling were identified and presented.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1504/ijlt.2019.106551

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Agbo, F. J., Oyelere, S. S., Suhonen, J., & Tukiainen, M.
Affiliations
University of Eastern Finland (FI)
Venue
International Journal of Learning Technology
Published
2019
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
331
ISSN
  • 1477-8386 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-8119
OpenAlex
W3016174410
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • International Journal of Learning Technology (publishedVersion)
  • UEF eRepo (University of Eastern Finland) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Learning Interventions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
Keywords
smart learning environments, programming education, educational technology design, personalized learning, immediate feedback, learning guides, computer science education, higher education in Nigeria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review