Cited by 7Digital Marketing and Social MediaMedia and Digital CommunicationTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

Understanding gratifications for engaging with short-video: a comparison of TikTok use in the USA and China

Shi, Jian, Ali, Mohammad, Chew, Fiona·2024·International Journal of Mobile Communications

Abstract

As one of the first comparative TikTok studies, we examine TikTok mobile app users' gratifications sought, gratifications obtained, and engagement in the USA and China to conceptualise a new comprehensive gratifications engagement model. This study comprises an original survey conducted in the USA (N = 148) and China (N = 150) in 2018. Our theoretical model predicted three TikTok engagement typologies among American and Chinese users, further providing evidence of the cross-cultural application of uses and gratifications theory. Overall, TikTok users tend to be more active in promoting themselves engaged in TikTok's video content than traditional short-video app (e.g., Snapchat) users. Our findings show that gratifications sought to play a more important role in the American engagement effects model than in the Chinese model. The outcomes of this study could be utilised by corporate brands to create better appeal strategies for customer engagement with the TikTok app.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1504/ijmc.2024.136627

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Identity construction on platforms such as Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat involves continuous processes of self-presentation, peer validation, and audience negotiation, particularly among younger users.

    “Studies indicate that identity construction on platforms such as Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat involves continuous processes of self-presentation, peer validation, and audience negotiation, particularly among younger users (Qutub, 2021; Savic, 2021; Shi et al., 2024).”

    From Classic Communication Theories in the Digital Realm: A Literature Review (2026) · cites this paper as Shi et al., 2024

  • Women and minority creators on influencer cultures and short-video platforms frequently face heightened scrutiny, differential engagement, or algorithmic suppression, which can constrain visibility regardless of competence or content quality.

    “For instance, research on influencer cultures and short-video platforms indicates that women and minority creators frequently face heightened scrutiny, differential engagement, or algorithmic suppression, which can constrain visibility regardless of competence or content quality (Shi et al., 2024).”

    From Classic Communication Theories in the Digital Realm: A Literature Review (2026) · cites this paper as Shi et al., 2024

  • In a cross-cultural comparison of TikTok use in the United States and China, while some users primarily seek light entertainment, others pursue visibility, self-promotion, or social recognition through creative participation.

    “Shi et al. (2024), in their cross-cultural comparison of TikTok use in the United States and China, show that while some users primarily seek light entertainment, others pursue visibility, self-promotion, or social recognition through creative participation.”

    From Classic Communication Theories in the Digital Realm: A Literature Review (2026) · cites this paper as Shi et al., 2024

  • Professionals often report higher communicative self-efficacy on LinkedIn than on TikTok.

    “For example, research shows that professionals often report higher communicative self-efficacy on platforms such as LinkedIn, where norms emphasize credentialed self-presentation, than on short-video platforms such as TikTok, where visual performance, algorithmic visibility, and creative fluency play a more decisive role (Brewer, 2018; Savic, 2021; Shi et al., 2024).”

    From Classic Communication Theories in the Digital Realm: A Literature Review (2026) · cites this paper as Shi et al., 2024

  • Shi et al. (2024) found that TikTok users in both USA and China engage more actively in self-promotion and content interaction compared to users of other short-video apps.

    “TikTok users in both countries were found to engage more actively in self-promotion and content interaction compared to users of other short-video apps which suggests that it is a goal-oriented platform for users seeking personal expression and recognition.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 7

Authors
Shi, J., Ali, M., & Chew, F.
Affiliations
Syracuse University (US)
Venue
International Journal of Mobile Communications
Published
2024
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
175-200
ISSN
  • 1470-949X (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-5217
OpenAlex
W4391724585
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Mobile Communications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
TikTok, short video platforms, uses and gratifications theory, gratification sought, user engagement, cross-cultural comparison, self-promotion, Snapchat, social media engagement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review