Cited by 12Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementSocial Sciences and HumanitiesForest Management and Policy

The costs of elite-oriented multi-stakeholder forums to address deforestation: the case of the Green Municipalities Program in the Brazilian Amazon

Open access
Londres, M., Larson, A.M., Barletti, J.P. Sarmiento·2021·International Forestry Review

Abstract

This paper examines the Green Municipalities Program (Programa Municípios Verdes – PMV) – a major multi-stakeholder forum designed to combat deforestation – in Pará state in the eastern Brazilian Amazon. We qualitatively analyzed in-depth interviews with 39 people with different perspectives: respondents with deep knowledge of the context but no direct involvement in the program, organizers of the program, diverse program participants, and diverse non-participants. We interrogated the PMV's strategy to address deforestation by collaborating directly with the powerful sectors that are driving it, while excluding indigenous and grassroots organizations from the process. The results reinforce the critique of 'anti-politics' approaches that prioritize technical solutions that focus on the consequences of environmental problems (such as deforestation) without addressing their underlying causes. The research highlights the risks of multi-stakeholder processes in highly unequal contexts that do not question the power of elites, and questions the legitimacy of initiatives that gain wide acclaim but are perceived locally as unjust.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1505/146554821833466112

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Londres, M., Larson, A. M., & Barletti, J. P. S.
Venue
International Forestry Review
Published
2021-07-26
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
76-89
ISSN
1465-5489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3194946271
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • The International Forestry Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Sciences and Humanities
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
deforestation, multi-stakeholder forums, anti-politics, power and inequality, legitimacy, Brazilian Amazon, Pará, environmental governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review