Effects of logging on non-timber forest product extraction in the Brazilian Amazon: community perceptions of change
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Another study of hunting rates in the Amazon using diaries found an average of 12 animals per household, and PRA estimates in one community in the region also estimated 12 animals per household.
“Another study of hunting rates in the Amazon using diaries found an average of 12 animals per household (Shanley 1999) and PRA estimates in one community in the region also estimated 12 animals per household (Menton 2003).”
From Company–Community Logging Contracts in Amazonian Settlements: Impacts on Livelihoods and NTFP Harvests (2009) · cites this paper as Menton 2003
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Menton, M. C. S., Merry, F. D., Lawrence, A., & Brown, N. (2009) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-02831-140139 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Menton, M. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Menton, M.C.
- ORCID
- Menton, M.C.
- Venue
- International Forestry Review
- Publisher
- Commonwealth Forestry Association
- Published
- 2003-06-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 97-105
- ISSN
- 1465-5489 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993685084
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The International Forestry Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Ecology and Conservation
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
- Keywords
- logging, non-timber forest products, community perceptions, forest disturbance, Amazonian communities, forest resource extraction, deforestation impacts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
