Cited by 290Diabetes Management and ResearchAdvanced Glycation End Products researchClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Clinical impact of glycated albumin as another glycemic control marker

Open access
Koga, Masafumi, Kasayama, Soji·2010·Endocrine Journal

Abstract

It is known that glycation among various proteins is increased in diabetic patients compared with non-diabetic subjects. Currently, among these glycated proteins, glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1C)) is used as the gold standard index of glycemic control in clinical practice for diabetes treatment. However, HbA(1C) does not accurately reflect the actual status of glycemic control in some conditions where plasma glucose changes during short term, and in patients who have diseases such as anemia and variant hemoglobin. In comparison, another index of glycemic control, glycated albumin (GA), more accurately reflects changes in plasma glucose during short term and also postprandial plasma glucose. Although GA is not influenced by disorders of hemoglobin metabolism, it is affected by disorders of albumin metabolism. This review summarizes diseases and pathological conditions where GA measurement is useful. These include the status of glycemic control changes during short term, diseases which cause postprandial hyperglycemia, iron deficiency anemia, pregnancy, chronic liver disease (liver cirrhosis), chronic renal failure (diabetic nephropathy), and variant hemoglobin.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1507/endocrj.k10e-138

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koga, M., & Kasayama, S.
Affiliations
  • Kinki Central Hospital (JP)
  • Nippon Life Hospital (JP)
Venue
Endocrine Journal
Published
2010
Volume
57
Issue
9
Pages
751-762
ISSN
  • 0918-8959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1348-4540
OpenAlex
W2084242756
Cited by
290
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 30
FWCI
3.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Endocrine Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Advanced Glycation End Products research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
glycated albumin, glycemic control, HbA1c, diabetes mellitus, albumin metabolism, postprandial hyperglycemia, iron deficiency anemia, pregnancy, chronic liver disease, liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney disease, diabetic nephropathy, hemoglobin variants, anemia
MeSH terms
Glycated Serum Albumin, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Nephropathies, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Hemoglobins, Abnormal, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Liver Cirrhosis, Pregnancy, Serum Albumin, Biomarkers, Glycation End Products, Advanced, Anemia, Iron-Deficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review