Cited by 260Digital Marketing and Social MediaMarketing and Advertising StrategiesConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification

Effects of Traditional Advertising and Social Messages on Brand-Building Metrics and Customer Acquisition

Open access
de Vries, Lisette, Gensler, Sonja, Leeflang, Peter S.H.·2017·Journal of Marketing

Abstract

This study examines the relative effectiveness of traditional advertising, impressions generated through firm-to-consumer (F2C) messages on Facebook, and the volume and valence of consumer-to-consumer (C2C) messages on Twitter and web forums for brand-building and customer acquisition efforts. The authors apply vector autoregressive modeling to a unique data set from a European telecom firm. This modeling approach allows them to consider the interrelations among traditional advertising, F2C impressions, and volume and valence of C2C social messages. The results show that traditional advertising is most effective for both brand building and customer acquisition. Impressions generated through F2C social messages complement traditional advertising efforts. Thus, thoroughly orchestrating traditional advertising and a firm's social media activities may improve a firm's performance with respect to building the brand and encouraging customer acquisition. Moreover, firms can stimulate the volume and valence of C2C messages through traditional advertising that in turn influences brand building and acquisition. These findings can help managers leverage the different types of messages more adequately.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1509/jm.15.0178

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Post characteristics have been found to affect engagement.

    “In line with this, post characteristics have been found to affect engagement (De Vries, Gensler, and Leeflang 2017; Sabate et al. 2014).”

    From Influencer Marketing on Instagram: Empirical Research on Social Media Engagement with Sponsored Posts (2022) · cites this paper as De Vries, Gensler, and Leeflang 2017

    The available passages from our copy are bibliographic material and keywords (labeled Abstract, no page number), not findings about post characteristics or engagement. Searches for those terms and for likes and comments found no passage addressing the claim, so this copy cannot verify it. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Vries, L., Gensler, S., & Leeflang, P. S. H.
Affiliations
  • Lisette de Vries, Store Support BV, Amsterdam
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • Aston University (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Gensler, Sonja
  • Leeflang, Peter S.H.
Venue
Journal of Marketing
Published
2017-09
Volume
81
Issue
5
Pages
1-15
ISSN
  • 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7185
OpenAlex
W2618036913
Cited by
260
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 2
FWCI
60.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Marketing (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Keywords
traditional advertising, social media marketing, brand building, customer acquisition, Facebook, Twitter, online forums, advertising effectiveness, telecommunications industry, message valence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review