Cited by 207Marketing and Advertising StrategiesDigital Marketing and Social MediaConsumer Market Behavior and Pricing

Practice Prize Paper—Marketing's Profit Impact: Quantifying Online and Off-line Funnel Progression

Open access
Wiesel, Thorsten, Pauwels, Koen, Arts, Joep·2011·Marketing Science

Abstract

Inofec, a small- to medium-sized enterprise in the business-to-business sector, desired a more analytic approach to allocate marketing resources across communication activities and channels. We developed a conceptual framework and econometric model to empirically investigate (1) the marketing communication effects on off-line and online purchase funnel metrics and (2) the magnitude and timing of the profit impact of firm-initiated and customer-initiated contacts. We find evidence of many cross-channel effects, in particular, off-line marketing effects on online funnel metrics and online funnel metrics on off-line purchases. Moreover, marketing communication activities directly affect both early and later purchase funnel stages (website visits, online and off-line information, and quote requests). Finally, we find that online customer-initiated contacts have substantially higher profit impact than off-line firm-initiated contacts. Shifting marketing budgets toward these activities in a field experiment yielded net profit increases 14 times larger than those for the status quo allocation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/mksc.1100.0612

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This fragmented approach has resulted in limited understanding of how travellers move through the entire journey, particularly how experiences evolve across touchpoints and collectively shape outcomes such as satisfaction and loyalty.

    “This fragmented approach has resulted in limited understanding of how travellers move through the entire journey, particularly how experiences evolve across touchpoints and collectively shape outcomes such as satisfaction and loyalty (Wiesel et al., 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiesel, T., Pauwels, K., & Arts, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • Özyeğin University (TR)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Marketing Science
Published
2011-07
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
604-611
ISSN
  • 0732-2399 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-548X
OpenAlex
W2141950067
Cited by
207
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
FWCI
16.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Marketing Science (publishedVersion)
  • eResearch@Ozyegin (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Keywords
marketing resource allocation, purchase funnel, digital marketing, offline marketing, cross-channel effects, B2B marketing, small and medium-sized enterprises, website visits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review