The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Passing the Torch: Intergenerational Influences as a Source of Brand Equity
Abstract
In today's competitive battleground, the concept of brand equity has proved to be an important source of strategic insights for marketers. However, one potentially valuable source of brand equity—the operation of intergenerational influences—has generally been overlooked in the marketing literature. This article reports the findings of two studies that show intergenerational impacts on brand equity to be persistent and powerful across an array of consumer packaged goods. However, as a strategic challenge, these effects seem to apply strongly for some brands but not for others—they are selective. In Study 1, the authors use parallel surveys of mother–daughter dyads to isolate and quantify intergenerational impacts, and the surveys reveal a differential range of effects at both the product category and the brand level. In Study 2, the authors use interpretivist methods to delve more deeply into these effects—the forms they take, the way they have developed, and factors that sustain or disrupt them. On the basis of these findings, the authors identify implications for managers and future research needs. Overall, intergenerational influences are a real marketplace phenomenon and a factor that merits much closer attention from marketing strategists who are interested in brand equity issues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research
Fournier, S. (1998) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209515 · Cited by 7,542
Muniz, A. M., & O'Guinn, T. C. (2001) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/319618 · Cited by 3,998
Cited by
Consumer Culture Theory (CCT): Twenty Years of Research
Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (2005) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/426626 · Cited by 3,677
Brands as relationship partners: Warmth, competence, and in‐between
Fournier, S., & Alvarez, C. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2011.10.003 · Cited by 385
Grønhøj, A., & Thøgersen, J. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.05.002 · Cited by 339
Consumer–Brand Relationships: A Contrast of Nostalgic and Non‐Nostalgic Brands
Kessous, A., Roux, E., & Chandon, J. (2015) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20772 · Cited by 120
Kharuhayothin, T., & Kerrane, B. (2018) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-10-2017-0694 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, E. S., Wilkie, W. L., & Lutz, R. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 17-37
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2032492219
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 35.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.