The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychological Implications of Customer Participation in Co-Production
Open accessAbstract
Customer participation in the production of goods and services appears to be growing. The marketing literature has largely focused on the economic implications of this trend and has not addressed customers’ potential psychological responses to participation. The authors draw on the social psychological literature on the self-serving bias and conduct two studies to examine the effects of participation on customer satisfaction. Study 1 shows that consistent with the self-serving bias, given an identical outcome, customer satisfaction with a firm differs depending on whether a customer participates in production. Study 2 shows that providing customers a choice in whether to participate mitigates the self-serving bias when the outcome is worse than expected. The authors present theoretical and practical implications and provide directions for further research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937
The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality
Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251929 · Cited by 12,003
Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
Kirk, R. (2013) · doi:10.4135/9781483384733 · Cited by 8,539
An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion
Weiner, B. (1985) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.92.4.548 · Cited by 7,846
Differentiation through customer involvement in production or delivery
Song, J. H., & Adams, C. R. (1993) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/07363769310039085 · Cited by 84
Cited by
Managing the co-creation of value
Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0070-0 · Cited by 3,502
The Role of Customer Engagement Behavior in Value Co-Creation: A Service System Perspective
Jaakkola, E., & Alexander, M. (2014) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670514529187 · Cited by 1,219
Customer experience challenges: Bringing together digital, physical and social realms
Bolton, R. N., McColl-Kennedy, J. R., Cheung, L., Gallan, A., Orsingher, C., Witell, L., & Zaki, M. (2018) · Journal of Service Management · doi:10.1108/josm-04-2018-0113 · Cited by 849
What is co-creation? An interactional creation framework and its implications for value creation
Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.027 · Cited by 735
Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2007) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.20077 · Cited by 686
Metadata
- Authors
- Bendapudi, N., & Leone, R. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14-28
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2166649938
- Cited by
- 1,493
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 30.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.