The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attention Capture and Transfer in Advertising: Brand, Pictorial, and Text-Size Effects
Abstract
The three key ad elements (brand, pictorial, and text) each have unique superiority effects on attention to advertisements, which are on par with many commonly held ideas in marketing practice. This is the main conclusion of an analysis of 1363 print advertisements tested with infrared eye-tracking methodology on more than 3600 consumers. The pictorial is superior in capturing attention, independent of its size. The text element best captures attention in direct proportion to its surface size. The brand element most effectively transfers attention to the other elements. Only increments in the text element's surface size produce a net gain in attention to the advertisement as a whole. The authors discuss how their findings can be used to render more effective decisions in advertising.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Posner, M. I. (1980) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/00335558008248231 · Cited by 9,670
Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research
Rayner, K. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372 · Cited by 7,979
Computational modelling of visual attention
Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35058500 · Cited by 4,733
Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass.
Öhman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.466 · Cited by 2,542
Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030 · Cited by 2,487
Visual attention during brand choice: The impact of time pressure and task motivation
Pieters, R., & Warlop, L. (1999) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/s0167-8116(98)00022-6 · Cited by 603
Self-citation
Cited by
Syam, N., & Sharma, A. (2018) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.12.019 · Cited by 852
Narrative and Persuasion in Fashion Advertising
Phillips, B. J., & McQuarrie, E. F. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/653087 · Cited by 350
Unstructured data in marketing
Balducci, B., & Marinova, D. (2018) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-018-0581-x · Cited by 300
Akpinar, E., & Berger, J. (2017) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.13.0350 · Cited by 267
Consumer Responses to AI-Generated Charitable Giving Ads
Arango, L., Singaraju, S. P., & Niininen, O. (2023) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2023.2183285 · Cited by 243
Metadata
- Authors
- Pieters, R., & Wedel, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 36-50
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2147156975
- Cited by
- 1,030
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 20.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.