The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Portfolios of Interfirm Agreements in Technology-Intensive Markets: Consequences for Innovation and Profitability
Abstract
Despite the high relevance of firms’ portfolios of upstream interfirm agreements in technology-intensive markets, little is known about their impact on innovative success. The authors develop a conceptual framework that explains the consequences of different portfolio descriptors for radical innovation, incremental innovation, and profitability. An empirical test in the pharmaceutical industry shows strong support for the developed theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92216-0 · Cited by 45,910
Granovetter, M. S. (1973) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/225469 · Cited by 40,491
Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393553 · Cited by 35,728
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy
Fukuyama, F., & Schumpeter, J. A. (1997) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20048211 · Cited by 15,264
POLANYI, M. (1997) · Knowledge in Organisations · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-9718-7.50010-x · Cited by 12,408
Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness
Uzzi, B. (1997) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393808 · Cited by 9,670
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Journal of Economic Literature
(2019) · AEA Papers and Proceedings · doi:10.1257/pandp.109.633 · Cited by 7,468
Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250141009 · Cited by 7,283
Cited by
Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for Marketing Science
Hauser, J., Tellis, G. J., & Griffin, A. (2006) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1050.0144 · Cited by 1,077
Firm Innovativeness and Its Performance Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration
Rubera, G., & Kirca, A. H. (2012) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.10.0494 · Cited by 835
The Effectiveness of Customer Participation in New Product Development: A Meta-Analysis
Chang, W., & Taylor, S. A. (2016) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.14.0057 · Cited by 507
Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification
Quintana-García, C., & Benavides-Velasco, C. A. (2008) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.002 · Cited by 466
Marketing Alliances, Firm Networks, and Firm Value Creation
Swaminathan, V., & Moorman, C. (2009) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.5.52 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Wuyts, S., Dutta, S., & Stremersch, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 88-100
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2003123792
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 68
- FWCI
- 23.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Portfolios of Interfirm Agreements in Technology-Intensive Markets: Consequences for Innovation and Profitability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1509/jmkg.68.2.88.27787
- The paper
- Wuyts, S., Dutta, S., & Stremersch, S. (2004). Portfolios of Interfirm Agreements in Technology-Intensive Markets: Consequences for Innovation and Profitability. Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.2.88.27787
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
