The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for Marketing Science
Abstract
Innovation is one of the most important issues in business research today. It has been studied in many independent research traditions. Our understanding and study of innovation can benefit from an integrative review of these research traditions. In so doing, we identify 16 topics relevant to marketing science, which we classify under five research fields: Consumer response to innovation, including attempts to measure consumer innovativeness, models of new product growth, and recent ideas on network externalities; Organizations and innovation, which are increasingly important as product development becomes more complex and tools more effective but demanding;. Market entry strategies, which includes recent research on technology revolution, extensive marketing science research on strategies for entry, and issues of portfolio management; Prescriptive techniques for product development processes, which have been transformed through global pressures, increasingly accurate customer input, Web-based communication for dispersed and global product design, and new tools for dealing with complexity over time and across product lines; Defending against market entry and capturing the rewards of innovating, which includes extensive marketing science research on strategies of defense, managing through metrics, and rewards to entrants. For each topic, we summarize key concepts and highlight research challenges. For prescriptive research topics, we also review current thinking and applications. For descriptive topics, we review key findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.398 · Cited by 4,957
Product development: Past research, present findings and future directions
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258850 · Cited by 3,777
Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality.
Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.4.650 · Cited by 3,504
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173933 · Cited by 3,487
The Challenge of Innovation Implementation
Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259164 · Cited by 2,113
Knee-deep in the big muddy: a study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action
Staw, B. M. (1976) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90005-2 · Cited by 2,061
Innovativeness: The Concept and Its Measurement
Midgley, D. F., & Dowling, G. R. (1978) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208701 · Cited by 1,550 · cited 4×
“Im, Bayus, and Mason (2003), Midgeley and Dowling (1993), and Venkatraman (1991) explored the relationship between innovativeness and demographics. Foxall (1988, 1995), Foxall and Goldsmith (1988), Goldsmith, Freiden, and Eastman (1995), Manning, Bearden, and Madden (1995), and Midgeley and Dowling (1993) studied the…”
BackgroundInfluentialCross-National Analysis of Diffusion of Consumer Durable Goods in Pacific Rim Countries
Takada, H., & Jain, D. (1991) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299105500206 · Cited by 391
Cited by
The Internet-of-Things: Review and research directions
Ng, I. C. L., & Wakenshaw, S. Y. L. (2017) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.003 · Cited by 621
Antons, D., & Piller, F. T. (2015) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2013.0091 · Cited by 289
Bartels, J., & Reinders, M. J. (2010) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.08.016 · Cited by 157
Bartels, J., & Onwezen, M. C. (2014) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12067 · Cited by 146
Ordanini, A., & Maglio, P. P. (2009) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2009.00238.x · Cited by 127
Metadata
- Authors
- Hauser, J., Tellis, G. J., & Griffin, A.
- Venue
- Marketing Science
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 687-717
- ISSN
- 0732-2399 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-548X
- OpenAlex
- W3122736754
- Cited by
- 1,077
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 50.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for Marketing Science. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mksc.1050.0144
- The paper
- Hauser, J., Tellis, G. J., & Griffin, A. (2006). Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for Marketing Science. Marketing Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1050.0144
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.